· Private foundation
The Vance R and Colleen H Andrus Family Foundation Aka the Indigo Oak Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k60 grants · $122k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $502k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRISIS CENTER | $25,000 |
| TRANSFORMATIVE JUSTICE COALITION | $20,000 |
| MILESTONE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER | $20,000 |
| LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW | $20,000 |
| TRI ARTS PROJECT | $20,000 |
| BERKELEY MUSIC GROUP | $20,000 |
| GROUNDWORK RANCH | $17,355 |
| SECOR | $15,000 |
| REENTRY INITIATIVE | $15,000 |
| THE DELORES PROJECT | $15,000 |
| COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND | $15,000 |
| FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| QUARTER PROJECT OF NORTHERN COLORADO | $15,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER4× · 2022–2025 · $58k · revenue +12%
- DCDOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +16%
- TDTHE DELORES PROJECT3× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- AHARCHWAY HOUSING & SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +38%
- TBThe Black Neighborhoodone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
- DCDANIEL C OAKES HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…
Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.
The Girls Athletic Leadership School, Denver (GALS) is the only public, all-girls charter school in the State of Colorado. GALS' mission is to empower young women to succeed academically, lead confidently, live boldly, and thrive…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
The conflict center equips people with practical skills to navigate, transform and embrace everyday conflict.
The Agile Learner Fund is a nonprofit organization of Colorado Succeeds. As a supporting organization, ALF exists for the express purpose of supporting activities that benefit Colorado Succeeds' mission, vision, and core strategies. More…
Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…
Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.
Endeavor colorado is a not-for-profit leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in colorado to catalyze long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region. high-impact…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The mission of the denver film society is to develop opportunities for diverse audiences to discover film through creative, thought-provoking experiences. we strive to cultivate and celebrate film as an art form; to enrich and expand the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates - Denver Casa and the most unlike its peers is The Malala Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds Douglas County Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MILESTONE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIVE JUSTICE COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES ↗
- Who funds Quarter Project of Northern Colorado ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE DELORES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE REENTRY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Secondary School ↗
- Who funds BERKELEY MUSIC GROUP ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Microfinance ↗
- Who funds elevateHER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds SECOR ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Fundamental Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds TRI ARTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHABOT SPACE & SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH RADIO ↗
- Who funds SparkHope Automotive ↗
- Who funds Groundwork Ranch ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND ↗
- Who funds One Goat Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Chapter 510 Ink ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Techbridge Girls ↗
- Who funds FOSTER SOURCE ↗
- Who funds National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING FOR KIDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Vance R and Colleen H Andrus Family Foundation Aka the Indigo Oak Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.