Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Valencia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$104kReligion$75kPhilanthropy$73kCommunity Improvement$48kFood & Nutrition$44kHuman Services$36kEducation$9kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$15,000
SERVANT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$10,000
AGROS$10,000
DIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS$5,000
TELEIOS$5,000
Combined Federal Campaign - CFC Foundation$2,500
Soul Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$380k · 12 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$380k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+60%

Still filing today

33%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TELEIOS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +18%
  • S
    SOULFORMATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +17%
  • UD
    UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • UP
    UNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • JR
    Jubilee REACH
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kellogg Fellows Leadership Alliance Inc
2
Summit Leadership Foundation

Serving communities around the world with the love of Jesus Christ by creating relational hubs for Connecting, Consulting, Coaching, Caring.

Religion
3
Ministerial Health Fellowship
Arts & Culture
4
Spiritual Leadership Inc

Our mission: Joining Jesus in creating culture transformation. The church in America has found itself in a generally ineffective leadership culture. We help steer them to a healthy culture while providing leadership training. We help…

Public Benefit
5
Servants Ministry

Servants Ministry fosters Christian fellowship at colleges and universities by organizing social activities bible studies regional conferences and by ministering to the spiritual needs of the students.

Religion
6
Soul Shepherding

We help pastors, missionaries, and other leaders go deeper with Jesus in emotional health and loving leadership through providing retreats, spiritual direction, coaching, and resources that integrate Jesus-centered psychology and spiritual…

Religion
7
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
8
Center for Faith and Work St Louis

The Center for Faith and Work St. Louis is a ministry focused on engaging the world through Biblical understanding of work and vocation. The character of God, shapes the character of our work. CFW seeks to engage all who desire to do…

Religion
9
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
10
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
11
Sonlife Classic Nfp

Sonlife Classic provides leadership coaching/mentoring, training events for church leaders, and disciple-making resources.

Religion
12
Radical Mentoring Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soulformation and the most unlike its peers is The Servant Leadership Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $104,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONTELEIOS — $65,500 · OtherTELEIOSLEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT — $47,800 · OtherLEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENTAGROS — $41,500 · OtherAGROSDIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS — $35,000 · OtherDIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS+10 more — $18,350 · Other+10 moreTHE SERVANT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $70,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SERVANT LEADERSH…COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FOUNDATIONINC — $2,500 · PhilanthropySOULFORMATION — $3,500 · ReligionUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE — $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE PRODIGY PROJECT — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $500 · Youth DevelopmentJubilee REACH — $1,200 · EducationRECOVERY CAFE — $1,000 · HealthSIDE BY SIDE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC — $1,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$312,150Philanthropy$72,500Religion$3,500Human Services$2,000Youth Development$1,500Education$1,200Health$1,000Membership Benefit$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SERVANT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetTELEIOS — $65,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSOULFORMATION — $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Development DBA Centered — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRODIGY PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRECOVERY CAFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SERVANT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TELEIOS
  • Who funds SOULFORMATION
  • Who funds COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE
  • Who funds Jubilee REACH
  • Who funds Leadership Development DBA Centered
  • Who funds THE PRODIGY PROJECT
  • Who funds RECOVERY CAFE
  • Who funds SIDE BY SIDE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encourage & Impact FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encourage & Impact Foundation · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Valencia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph