· Public charity
The Urban Child Institute
The urban child institute is dedicated to promoting the education, health, and well-being of young children in shelby county.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $237k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+5 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UTHSC | $1,055,000 |
| LeBonheur Children's Hospital | $861,000 |
| UM Research Foundation | $600,500 |
| Porter Leath | $405,000 |
| ALL Memphis | $305,000 |
| tennesseans for quality early education | $200,000 |
| Literacy MidSouth | $140,000 |
| Memphis Teacher Residency | $100,000 |
| Believe Academy | $100,000 |
| Mid-South Food Bank | $100,000 |
| Seeding Success | $100,000 |
| MLH Foundation | $100,000 |
| SuCasa | $85,000 |
| UM Foundation | $85,000 |
| Neighborhood Christian Center | $77,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LBLe Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $23M · revenue +64% · 37% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +227%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +75% · 40% of their budget
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.5M · revenue +53%
- F8First 8 Memphisone grant, 2022 · $125k
- BFBOOKS FROM BIRTH INCone grant, 2017 · $110k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop and implement programs to meet major urban challenges that exist for memphis, tennessee
To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children from birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.
City leadership's mission is to recruit, develop, and catalyze leaders for the benefit of the city of memphis. the organization was founded in order to maximize the leadership capital and potential of memphis. city leadership strives to…
The mission is to create memorable learning experiences through the joy of play, in hands-on exhibits and programs. we accomplish this mission by reaching out to the mid-south school children, families, and the tourist visitor.
To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
Lead public schools exists to prepare all our students with the knowledge and skills to succeed in college and in life.
Leadership tennessee fosters collaborative, non-partisan dialogue on issues of state importance, by connecting and deploying a network of diverse leaders and engaged citizens.
To produce plays and encourage the arts by performance and educational programs.
Kipp memphis public schools (kmps) is part of the non-profit kipp public schools network. together with families and communities, kmps create joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare students with the skills and confidence to…
To work in partnership with the shelby county school district and the achievement school district on strategies that support school improvement, development, and implementation of initiatives focused on increasing k-12 educational outcomes…
Memphis tomorrow is an association of ceos of memphis' largest businesses working to promote opportunity and quality of life for all memphians through collective action and public-private partnerships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Leadership Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jessran Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Le Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORTER-LEATH ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH ↗
- Who funds ALLMEMPHIS INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION POLICY AND RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds SEEDING SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds LITERACY MID-SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Methodist Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds SchoolSeed Foundation ↗
- Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARISE2READ INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC ↗
- Who funds HARWOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Su Casa Family Ministries ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE MEMPHIS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds SU CASA - ENDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE SYCAMORE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Apple Seeds Inc ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT TRANSFORMATION TENNESSEE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE BY ONE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Preservation Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSEE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF INFANT MENTAL HEALTH IN TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds BOOKS FROM BIRTH INC ↗
- Who funds KNOWLEDGE QUEST INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee ↗
- Who funds Kindred Place Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mid South · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · Slingshot Memphis Inc · Plough Foundation · Women's Foundation for a Greater Memphis · The Kresge Foundation · Belz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Urban Child Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.