· Public charity
Women's Foundation for a Greater Memphis
To encourage philanthropy and foster leadership among women and support programs that enable women and children to reach their full potential.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 51 grants below total $2,144,003 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,245,030 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,027 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $778k
- $250k+1 grant · $324k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $323,950 |
| Individual grant recipient | $130,000 |
| KNOWLEDGE QUEST | $125,250 |
| MIFA METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION | $90,250 |
| URBAN STRATEGIESMEMPHIS HOPE | $80,250 |
| YWCA OF GREATER MEMPHIS | $70,250 |
| WOMEN OF COLOR COLLABORATIVE | $64,500 |
| PLAYPOWER LT-FARMINGTON INC | $60,681 |
| CODECREW | $57,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER | $50,250 |
| SEEDING SUCCESS | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS (HERFFGEE HERE) | $47,250 |
| LEMOYNE-OWEN COLLEGE | $47,054 |
| GIRLS INC OF MEMPHIS | $45,750 |
| ADVANCE MEMPHIS | $45,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
61 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSouthwest Tennessee Community College Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $724k · revenue +238%
- KQKNOWLEDGE QUEST INC9× · 2017–2025 · $674k · revenue +113%
URBAN STRATEGIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $644k · revenue +203%
Funded once
- MSMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER (SHELECTRCITY)one grant, 2021 · $40k
- MCMEMPHIS CHALLENGEone grant, 2021 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop and implement programs to meet major urban challenges that exist for memphis, tennessee
To encourage philanthropy and foster leadership among women and support programs that enable women and children to reach their full potential.
Reach memphis helps high achieving students from shelby county public schools succeed in high school, college and beyond using a continuum of services including summer educational experiences, college readiness planning and counseling, and…
To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community
Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.
Memphis tomorrow is an association of ceos of memphis' largest businesses working to promote opportunity and quality of life for all memphians through collective action and public-private partnerships.
To enrich the lives of the developmentally challenged by meeting their social, recreational and continuing educational needs.
City leadership's mission is to recruit, develop, and catalyze leaders for the benefit of the city of memphis. the organization was founded in order to maximize the leadership capital and potential of memphis. city leadership strives to…
To serve our members and partners by improving the quality of life through regional economic prosperity.
To build a cross-class multi-racial progressive alliance, by combining integrated voter engagement, distributive organization, and sustained leadership development.
To produce plays and encourage the arts by performance and educational programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Challenge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Collage Dance Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 61. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Southwest Tennessee Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds KNOWLEDGE QUEST INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds RISE MEMPHIS INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association ↗
- Who funds SEEDING SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds Karat Place Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PORTER-LEATH ↗
- Who funds STREETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Memphis Inner City Rugby ↗
- Who funds HOPE WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW BALLET ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES MATTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds LeMoyne-Owen College ↗
- Who funds CODECREW ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALLMEMPHIS INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN TECHNOLOGY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · United Way of the Mid South · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Slingshot Memphis Inc · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · The Urban Child Institute · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · The Day Foundation · Memphis Equity Through Arts Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women's Foundation for a Greater Memphis funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.