Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The United Way of Southwest Missouri

The organization provides allocations to other community agencies to serve the community and its citizens, and offers various support to parents and children in the community.

$364k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.

Human Services$651kHealth$530kYouth Development$311kPublic Safety & Disaster$295kHousing & Shelter$230kCrime & Legal$164kEducation$103kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $328,611 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $364,011 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $248k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
$17,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB JOPLIN$62,451
LAFAYETTE HOUSE$47,000
REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE$37,500
COMMUNITY CLINIC$24,660
SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER$19,000
CHILDRENS HAVEN OF SW MO$18,000
WESLEY HOUSE$17,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$17,000
JOPLIN NALA$17,000
JOPLIN FAMILY Y$14,000
CHILDRENS CENTER$14,000
LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MO$13,000
CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SEK$9,000
PITTSBURG FAMILY Y$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Baxter Springs Ministerial Alliance: $3k → 16%Safehouse Crisis Center: $25k → 18%SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 18%Family Resource Center: $24k → 18%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $24k → 18%SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER: $23k → 18%YMCA SEK: $23k → 18%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $22k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SEK: $21k → 18%SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 18%SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER: $19k → 18%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 18%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 18%PITTSBURG FAMILY Y: $16k → 18%PITTSBURG FAMILY Y: $16k → 18%PITTSBURG FAMILY Y: $15k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SEK: $10k → 18%PITTSBURG FAMILY Y: $9k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SEK: $9k → 18%Joplin Family Y: $31k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SEK: $5k → 18%Catholic Charities-SEK: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 20 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+67%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $276k · revenue +0%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
    5× · 2017–2021 · $136k · revenue +332%
  • SC
    SAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $112k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRI-STATE FAMILY YMCAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue +125%
  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • HM
    HOME MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Service and Guidance Center of Topeka Inc

Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…

Health
2
Sunlight Children's Services Inc

To protect and nurture children at risk by developing, supporting, serving, and protecting the interests of children.

—
3
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
4
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
5
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
6
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
7
Southeast Kansas Mental Health Center

To provide and advocate for the highest quality whole-person care to improve the health and quality of life in our communities.

Health
8
Disability Rights Center of Kansas Inc

Zealously advocating for the disability rights of kansans to protect their full participation as citizens.

Civil Rights
9
Dui Victims Center of Kansas Inc

Reduce the impact an impaired driving crash has on victims, survivors and their families, and increase awareness of the traumatic human consequences of the choice to drive impaired

Education
10
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.

Environment
11
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
12
Central Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates

Provides a voice for abused and neglected children who are under the legal protection of the court system

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southeast Kansas Respite Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr17%39%35–55yr22%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr17%27%35–55yr22%31%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
9%
192/2,044

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club Joplin — $353,330 · OtherBoys and Girls Club JoplinFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $275,679 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY — $267,520 · OtherCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTYREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE — $191,934 · OtherREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARECOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $135,759 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURIChildrens Haven — $109,292 · OtherChildrens HavenFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $105,799 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHJOPLIN NALA — $87,594 · Other+11 more — $119,761 · Other+11 moreSAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER INC — $111,903 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENT…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $104,641 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTE…JOPLIN FAMILY Y — $87,274 · Human ServicesJOPLIN FAMILY YYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURG — $78,843 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN …CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $47,296 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES IN…+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesLegal Aid of Western Missouri — $87,382 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $74,206 · Crime & LegalTRI-STATE FAMILY YMCA — $23,811 · Housing & ShelterGIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC — $16,443 · Youth DevelopmentSPRING RIVER MENTAL HEALTH & WELLNESS INC — $2,600 · HealthDCCCA INC — $1,500 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,111 · HealthSPARKWHEEL INC — $2,500 · Education
Other$1,646,668Human Services$432,957Crime & Legal$161,588Housing & Shelter$23,811Youth Development$16,443Health$5,211Education$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $275,679 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY — $267,520 over 5y, 15% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE — $191,934 over 5y, 100% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $135,759 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetSAFEHOUSE CRISIS CENTER INC — $111,903 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $104,641 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetJOPLIN NALA — $87,594 over 5y, 30% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri — $87,382 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y — $87,274 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURG — $78,843 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $74,206 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND — $51,206 over 4y, 23% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $47,296 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-STATE FAMILY YMCA — $23,811 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC — $16,443 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $13,385 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306 — $12,220 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS INC — $9,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHOME MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSOUTHEAST KANSAS MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetSPRING RIVER MENTAL HEALTH & WELLNESS INC — $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARKWHEEL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDCCCA INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,111 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Commerce Bancshares F…Cloyd a Carlin Charit…Freeman R Johnson Tru…Cragin Joy Spiva Char…Jean Jack and Mildred…Arvest FoundationFredrick G and Rebeka…W R Corley Memorial T…Carthage Area United …Kansas Health Foundat…The Sunderland Founda…
Community Foundation of Southeast KansasKS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Arvest Foundation · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Carthage Area United Way · Kansas Health Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The United Way of Southwest Missouri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home