Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$492k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$103k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $492k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
18
’18
18
’19
18
’20
16
’21
14
’22
13
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.2MArts & Culture$729kHuman Services$503kReligion$315kEducation$192kRecreation & Sports$98kHealth$91kInternational$75kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k9 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $418k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCERTS IN MOTION$103,000
DOROT$100,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$75,000
NJOP$60,000
JEWISH FILM INSTITUTE$20,000
ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND$17,500
AMERICAN ZIONIST MOVEMENT$15,000
RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY$10,000
BETH JACOB CONGREGATION$4,005
COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$2,000
MCH MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
WALDO COUNTY YMCA$1,000
MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS & GARDENERS ASSOC$1,000
INDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $1k → 11%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $1k → 11%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $1k → 11%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $1k → 11%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $1k → 11%WALDO COUNTY YMCA: $1k → 13%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $500 → 11%NEW HOPE FOR WOMEN: $500 → 11%DOROT: $100k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 44 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 33 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
28

Total granted

$2.0M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-4%

Still filing today

36%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationReligionHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CONCERTS IN MOTION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $547k · revenue +123%
  • DI
    DOROT INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $475k · revenue +35%
  • RP
    RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -4%
  • C
    CIM
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • CC
    CIM CONCERNTS IN MOTION
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
7
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Telling Room. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $4,111,453 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $75,000 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FO…SF JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $57,540 · OtherSF JEWISH FILM F…KEHILLAT ISRAEL RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION OF PACIFIC PALISADES: $37,500 · OtherCIM CONCERTS IN MOTION: $32,500 · OtherENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND: $32,500 · OtherHEALTHY HUMOR INC: $67,000 · OtherHEALTHY HUMOR IN…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $34,000 · OtherTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $55,000 · OtherTHE ACTORS' FUND…+60 more: $482,419 · Other+60 moreCONCERTS IN MOTION INC: $547,000 · Arts & CultureCONCERTS …Jewish Film Institute: $22,046 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDOROT INC: $475,000 · Human Services+2 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $150,000 · ReligionAmerican Zionist Movement Inc: $15,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 · InternationalRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $97,500 · Environment
Philanthropy$4,111,453Other$953,459Arts & Culture$570,046Human Services$482,000Religion$165,000International$100,000Environment$97,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $4,111,453 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERTS IN MOTION INC: $547,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetDOROT INC: $475,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $150,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $97,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY HUMOR INC: $67,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $31,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $22,046 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCANCER COMMONS: $22,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Zionist Movement Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCarmel Academy: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR WOMEN INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Farmland Trust: $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Telling Room: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWaldo County YMCA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CONCERTS IN MOTION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY HUMOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds CANCER COMMONS ↗
  • Who funds American Zionist Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Carmel Academy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Maine Community Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Cooperative Development Institute Inc: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ullendorff Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ullendorff Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph