Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Twf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$4.6MRecreation & Sports$2.7MEducation$1.5MPhilanthropy$278kHealth$189kEmployment$155kHuman Services$58kCivil Rights$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $405k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.3M
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTER$2,000,000
12TH MAN FOUNDATION$1,160,000
YWAM COSTA RICA$1,102,000
JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$1,000,000
URSULINE$100,000
HOLY TRINITY SEMINARY$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RETT SYNDROME FOUNDATION$100,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$55,000
ANNAPOLIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$41,715
ONE TRIBE FOUNDATION - 22KILL$25,000
CHRIST THE KING$5,050
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($8.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($1.4M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 5%SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION: $22k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
NV
OH
NJ
CA
NE
MD
AR
DC
TX

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($1.4M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Costa Rica$1.4M · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 17 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$7.5M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+78%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +170%
  • IR
    International Rett Syndrome Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +17%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION COSTA RICAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $145k · revenue +89%
  • DE
    DEMOCRACY ENGINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • YY
    YCP - YOUNG CATHOLIC PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Surfing Association Inc

To develop and promote the sport of surfing globally. the organization is recognized by the international olympic committee as the world governing authority for surfing, standup paddle (sup) surfing and racing, and all other wave riding…

Recreation & Sports
2
Gordon Research Conferences Inc

The gordon research conferences, inc. provide an international forum for the presentation and discussion of frontier research in the biological, chemical, physical and engineering sciences and their interfaces. *see schedule o*

Science & Tech
3
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
Acec Research Institute

Acec research institute serve as the leading source of knowledge and thought leadership for creating a more sustainable, safe, secure, and technically advanced built environment. identify, fund, and provide industry wide research forecasts…

Unclassified
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Usa Track & Field Inc

USA Track & Field drives competitive excellence and popular engagement in the sport of track and field, long distance running and race walking. The mission of USA Track & Field is to foster sustained competitive excellence in elite…

Recreation & Sports
8
Nc State Natural Resources Foundation Inc

To promote education and research in the college of natural resources of north carolina state university as well as aid and promote, by financial assistance and otherwise, all types of education, research and extension in the college of…

Education
9
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
11
Internet Society

To promote the open development, evolution, and use of the internet for the benefit of all people throughout the world.

International
12
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M University 12th Man Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Rett Syndrome Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTER: $2,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTERJESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $1,224,000 · OtherJESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOLYWAM COSTA RICA: $1,197,000 · OtherYWAM COSTA RICAHOLY TRINITY SEMINARY: $950,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY SEMINARYTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $277,999 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $236,715 · OtherURSULINE: $233,334 · Other+10 more: $476,592 · Other+10 moreTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $2,680,000 · EducationTexas A&M University 12th Man F…+1 more: $75,000 · EducationInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $175,000 · HealthYOUTH WITH A MISSION COSTA RICA: $145,000 · InternationalANNAPOLIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsSHERWOOD FOREST CLUB BOYS & GIRLS SUMMER CAMP: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $57,300 · Human Services22KILL: $14,200 · PhilanthropyCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $1,620 · Environment
Other$6,595,640Education$2,755,000Health$175,000International$145,000Recreation & Sports$65,000Human Services$57,300Philanthropy$14,200Environment$1,620

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $2,680,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $175,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION COSTA RICA: $145,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCornell University: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $57,300 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetANNAPOLIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CLUB BOYS & GIRLS SUMMER CAMP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget22KILL: $14,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $1,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
  • Who funds International Rett Syndrome Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION COSTA RICA ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CLUB BOYS & GIRLS SUMMER CAMP ↗
  • Who funds 22KILL ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Rosemary Haggar Vaughan Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Twf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Twf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Chesapeake Conservancy Inc: 27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twf’s filings →

More from the funding graph