· Private foundation
The Tuthill Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $90k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL INC | $50,000 |
| OUR PLACE INC | $20,000 |
| UPPER VALLEY HAVEN | $9,000 |
| WEST CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FND | $7,000 |
| COALITION FOR OPEN DEMOCRACY | $5,000 |
| SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND | $5,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK | $4,500 |
| WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE WISE | $4,500 |
| GRAFTON COUNTY SR CITIZENS COUNCIL | $4,000 |
| JUST ZERO | $4,000 |
| ACWORTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC | $3,500 |
| CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION - NH | $3,000 |
| MAINE RIVERS | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MUSEUM | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OPOUR PLACE NH3× · 2022–2024 · $82k · revenue +453%
- TSTROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION6× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +439%
- UVUPPER VALLEY HAVEN6× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- AMALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEMone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
- CDCAPITAL DISTRICT GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +197%
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.
To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.
To stage the finest professional opera productions in Southeastern New England. To excite and build audiences for the enjoyment of a grand art form. To offer educational programs and creative community outreach events that expand the opera…
To protect and preserve the Wentworth-Crescent Watershed through initiatives that enhance water quality, land conservation and community education.
Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties
The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…
The Chamber helps to make individuals aware of the activities, services, and businesses available in our area, in order to help stimulate the local economy, and enhance, support and promote the prosperity of its members.
To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
To strengten local government while combining total resources to meet regional challenges beyond individual capacities and to serve as a mutual forum to identify, study, and to bring into focus regional interest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Heritage Trail of New Hampshire Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baby Steps Family Assistance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUR PLACE NH ↗
- Who funds TROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds ALBANY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Harvest International ↗
- Who funds Coalition For Open Democracy ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL DISTRICT RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Grafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc ↗
- Who funds JUST ZERO ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST FAMILY PROMISE ↗
- Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ACWORTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL REGION CLASSICAL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL DISTRICT GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Albany Pro Musica Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS OF MA'ALWYCK INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Kiwi Foundation · The Bender Family Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Review Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · The Troy Savings Bank Charitable Fo · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tuthill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Journalism Trust Ltd — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Tuthill Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Tuthill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.