Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Trzcinski Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$650k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$5.9MEducation$4.2MCivil Rights$955kHealth$808kPublic Benefit$205kPhilanthropy$80kFood & Nutrition$75kArts & Culture$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $860k
  • $250k+1 grant · $650k
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE$650,000
SECRETARIAT OF THE SHRINE OF SAINTE-ANNE-DEBEAUPRE$200,000
MARIANS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$100,000
HOLY FAMILY CHURCH$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
ROAD TO HOPE$100,000
MARY QUEEN OF PEACE$100,000
NATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$60,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF ST CECILIA$30,000
DOMINICAN HOUSE OF STUDIESDOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION$30,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HOLY FAMILY HOME$25,000
ST THOMAS AQUINAS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Open M: $20k → 13%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of The Trzcinski Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Trzcinski Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 20 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$6.9M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +58%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    4× · 2017–2022 · $920k · revenue +134%
  • TR
    THE ROAD TO HOPE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $116k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • DS
    Dominican Sisters of St Cecilia Con
    one grant, 2022 · $366k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $227k · revenue +29%
  • FS
    FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $204k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
3
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
4
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

9
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
10
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cleveland Opera Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentFood Pantries & AssistanceAffordable Housing Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Government Accountability R…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%76%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Our Lady of Guadalupe Church — $2,250,000 · OtherOur Lady of Guadalupe ChurchBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $666,138 · OtherBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC — $650,000 · OtherSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INCOUR LADY OF PEACE CHURCH — $510,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE CHURCHDominican Sisters of St Cecilia Con — $365,770 · OtherST CECILIA CONGREGATION — $350,000 · Other+54 more — $2,997,855 · Other+54 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,222,446 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGETHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $1,017,496 · EducationTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE+1 more — $10,000 · EducationALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $920,240 · Civil Rights+1 more — $5,000 · Civil RightsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $226,859 · HealthTHE ROAD TO HOPE INC — $115,500 · HealthTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE — $95,000 · Public BenefitTHE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC — $65,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $65,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$7,789,763Education$3,249,942Civil Rights$925,240Health$342,359Public Benefit$200,000Arts & Culture$65,500Food & Nutrition$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,222,446 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $1,017,496 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $920,240 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $226,859 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD TO HOPE INC — $115,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC — $65,000 over 5y, 87% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBill of Rights Institute — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $18,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAtlas Economic Research Foundation — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCleveland Opera Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds SHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE ROAD TO HOPE INC
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds WORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES
  • Who funds NATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Fedeli Family Charitable Foundation · Fred a Lennon Charitable Trust · Community West Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Trzcinski Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Trzcinski Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Trzcinski Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph