· Private foundation
The Coville-Triest Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k79 grants · $164k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $423k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| D-SNIP | $49,450 |
| Individual grant recipient | $36,000 |
| YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH | $35,000 |
| W P K N | $30,000 |
| SARASOTA PARROT CONSERVATORY INC | $26,000 |
| MEOR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES | $25,000 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF DETROIT | $21,800 |
| KOLLEL OF GREATER DETROIT | $20,000 |
| CITYSEED | $20,000 |
| ELEPHANT CARE INTERNATIONAL | $15,900 |
| MEER | $15,000 |
| CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICE | $15,000 |
| ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL | $12,500 |
| ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ATASOLO THEATRE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +25%
- MIMEOR INC6× · 2019–2024 · $308k · revenue +35%
- SPSARASOTA PARROT CONSERVATORY7× · 2018–2024 · $148k · revenue +126% · 73% of their budget
Funded once
- KRKEHAL RINA UTEFILAHone grant, 2023 · $160k
- JCJEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNINGone grant, 2021 · $68k
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue +133%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
Animal rescues. pet adoption center. shelter cruelty victims. farm animals. wildlife refuge. spay/neuter. humane education. youth work. grief counseling. human health via pets.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.
Peace 4 animals animal welfare organization supports the conservation of endangered species worldwide. we work on campaigns to promote advocacy and education on how to protect wildlife in peril, as well as the preservation of their natural…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Mack Alive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASOLO THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA PARROT CONSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds DETROIT CHESED PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL INC US ↗
- Who funds WPKN Incorporated ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES ↗
- Who funds COTS ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVENLEON SISTER PROJECT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION AND WELLNESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
- Who funds ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Metro Food Rescue ↗
- Who funds ELEPHANT CARE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WILD BIRD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Zero Line Logistics ↗
- Who funds BAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL CHOSHEN MISHPAT ↗
- Who funds CITY SEED INC ↗
- Who funds BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Kresge Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Dte Energy Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Borsand Family Foundation Inc · Pappas Foundation Inc · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Coville-Triest Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Seed Inc — 87% of income from government
- Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc — 68% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- Wpkn Incorporated — 2% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Holocaust Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Cat Depot — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Coville-Triest Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Coville-Triest Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.