Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Train Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$62kEnvironment$22kEducation$10kArts & Culture$4kAnimals$4kHuman Services$2kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
10
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Satilla Riverkeeper$4,420
St Pauls Episcopal Church$3,675
Saint Peter Church$3,080
King of Peace Episcopal Church$1,025
Episcopal High School$550
The Colony Foundation$550
Gallery on the Green$500
Center for Sustainable Coast$450
St Marys Little Theater$350
Yale University$250
The Nature Conservancy$175
Individual grant recipient$170
Environmental Defense Fund$150
Ducks Unlimited$150
Compassion and Choices$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Life On Wheels: $1k → 18%Magnolia Manor: $80 → 14%Magnolia Manor: $60 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 62 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
44

Total granted

$91k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+16%

Still filing today

53%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    Satilla Riverwatch Alliance Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +18%
  • TP
    THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +57%
  • DO
    Defenders of Wildlife
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +36%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • CC
    Catholic Charity Relief
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
3
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
4
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
5
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
6
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
7
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
10
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
11
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
12
Environment Now
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Colony Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETERS CHURCH INC: $33,085 · OtherST PETERS CHURCH INCST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8,678 · OtherST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHSaint Peter Church: $7,990 · OtherSaint Peter ChurchST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3,675 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other+79 more: $26,950 · Other+79 moreCenter for Sustainable Coast: $9,040 · EnvironmentCenter for Sustain…Satilla Riverwatch Alliance Inc: $5,230 · EnvironmentSatilla Riverwatch…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $865 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $730 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $725 · Environment+10 more: $1,875 · Environment+10 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $35 · EducationDefenders of Wildlife: $1,005 · AnimalsFlorida Wildlife Federation: $605 · AnimalsRIVERBANKS SOCIETY: $414 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $380 · AnimalsThe Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust: $225 · Animals+1 more: $70 · AnimalsTHE WHALE MUSEUM: $600 · Arts & CultureTHIOKOL MEMORIAL PROJECT INC: $325 · Arts & CultureFirst Colony Foundation: $250 · Arts & CultureLIFE ON WHEELS: $1,000 · Human ServicesMagnolia Manor Inc: $140 · Human ServicesCATO INSTITUTE: $800 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $110 · Public Benefit
Other$83,378Environment$18,465Education$6,535Animals$2,699Arts & Culture$1,175Human Services$1,140Public Benefit$910

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter for Sustainable Coast: $9,040 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSatilla Riverwatch Alliance Inc: $5,230 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $3,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,075 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $1,005 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE ON WHEELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLONY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $865 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $730 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $725 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Federation: $605 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHALE MUSEUM: $600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $530 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $425 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBERKELEY DIVINITY SCHOOL: $425 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA RIVER NETWORK INC dba GEORGIA RIVERS: $415 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERBANKS SOCIETY: $414 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $385 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $380 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $370 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHIOKOL MEMORIAL PROJECT INC: $325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $265 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Colony Foundation: $250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMagnolia Manor Inc: $140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $110 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOne Hundred Miles Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLYNN ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $90 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAltamaha Riverkeeper Inc: $90 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS RIVERKEEPER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Center for Sustainable Coast ↗
  • Who funds Satilla Riverwatch Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds COLONY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Florida Wildlife Federation ↗
  • Who funds THE WHALE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY DIVINITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA RIVER NETWORK INC dba GEORGIA RIVERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sapelo Foundation IncGA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sapelo Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Communities of Coastal Georgia Foundation Inc · Patagoniaorg · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Train Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Train Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Train Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Train Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Train’s filings →

    More from the funding graph