Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tose Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$525kHealth$350kReligion$220kHousing & Shelter$130kFood & Nutrition$80kAnimals$30kYouth Development$20kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $230k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation$25,000
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform$25,000
Ron Carpenter Ministries$25,000
Compassion International$20,000
The Light House Inc$20,000
Helen Keller International$15,000
Malaria Consortium US$15,000
Heifer International$15,000
Against Malaria Foundation$15,000
New Incentives$15,000
Larry Huch Ministries$10,000
World Harvest Church$10,000
Helping Up Mission$10,000
Maryland Food Bank$10,000
Seeds 4 Success$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Malaria Consortium US: $16k → 13%New Incentives: $16k → 14%Helen Keller International: $16k → 17%Heifer International: $20k → 17%Against Malaria Foundation: $16k → 15%WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH: $10k → 9%World Harvest Church: $10k → 9%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Malaria Consortium US: $15k → 13%New Incentives: $15k → 14%Helen Keller International: $15k → 17%Heifer International: $20k → 17%Against Malaria Foundation: $15k → 15%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Malaria Consortium US: $15k → 13%New Incentives: $15k → 14%Helen Keller International: $15k → 17%Heifer International: $18k → 17%Against Malaria Foundation: $15k → 15%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Malaria Consortium US: $15k → 13%New Incentives: $15k → 14%Helen Keller International: $15k → 17%Heifer International: $15k → 17%Against Malaria Foundation: $15k → 15%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Heifer International: $15k → 17%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Heifer International: $15k → 17%Maryland Food Bank: $10k → 11%Helping Up Mission: $10k → 19%Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation: $25k → 6%Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation: $25k → 6%Anne Arundel Center: $25k → 6%The Light House Inc: $25k → 6%Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation: $25k → 6%Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation: $25k → 6%Light House: $25k → 6%The Light House Inc: $20k → 6%Anne Arundel Center: $20k → 6%The Light House Inc: $20k → 6%Light House: $20k → 6%The Light House Inc: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Tose Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 4%.

The Tose Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 20 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$20k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +18%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k · revenue +16%
  • LH
    LUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • WO
    WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH OF MURFREESBORO TN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • B
    BREAKTHROUGH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IM
    INSPIRATION MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
Luminis Health Inc

Support and encourage quality health care, medical, and related services across anne arundel, prince george's, calvert, queen anne's, and talbot and kent counties, by among other activities, conducting fundraising and other operations for…

Health
5
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
6
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
7
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Lalmba Association

We engage with rural communities in africa by providing life-saving medical services, transformative education and empowerment opportunities, and support for at-risk and vulnerable populations to help build healthy, sustainable, and…

International
10
Muso Inc

Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.

International
11
Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc

Vitamin angels helps at-risk populations in need, specifically pregnant women, new mothers and children under five, gain access to life changing micronutrients.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ron Carpenter Ministries: $165,000 · OtherRon Carpenter MinistriesCenter for Bio- Ethical Reform: $145,000 · OtherCenter for Bio- Ethical ReformHeifer International: $102,500 · OtherHeifer InternationalTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCHELPING UP MISSION INC: $60,000 · OtherHELPING UP MISSION INCAnne Arundel Center: $45,000 · OtherAnne Arundel CenterLarry Huch Ministries: $30,000 · Other+9 more: $120,000 · Other+9 moreLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · HealthLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE A…MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $61,250 · HealthMALARIA CONSORTIUM US…The Against Malaria Foundation: $61,250 · HealthThe Against Malaria F…ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $35,000 · HealthANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CO…Compassion International Incorporated: $117,500 · InternationalCompassion Internati…NEW INCENTIVES: $61,250 · InternationalNEW INCENTIVESHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $61,250 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNA…THE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $130,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT …SEEDS 4 SUCCESS INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$727,500Health$257,500International$240,000Housing & Shelter$130,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $61,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEW INCENTIVES: $61,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $61,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $61,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $35,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSEEDS 4 SUCCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds LUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW INCENTIVES ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS 4 SUCCESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation IncOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tose Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tose Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Seeds 4 Success Inc: 48% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tose’s filings →

More from the funding graph