Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tomash Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$415kHealth$399kReligion$17kScience & Tech$5kFood & Nutrition$3kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MT MADONNA INSTITUTE$20,000
HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ$5,000
SRI RAM FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$100
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$100
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$100
MHCAN$100
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100
SMILE TRAIN$100
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$100
FINCA$100
KQED$100
EASTERSEALS$100
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH: $1k → 12%BERKLEY FOOD AND HOUSING: $500 → 10%BERKELEY FOOD & HOUSING PROJECT: $100 → 10%ENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
SD
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$825k · 37 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
40

Total granted

$825k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+48%

Still filing today

35%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthReligionAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +90%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +25%
  • GF
    GLIDE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • MF
    MPUSD FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • VO
    VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • S
    SFSU
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
9
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
11
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
12
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mount Madonna Institute: $387,961 · OtherMount Madonna InstituteMT MADONNA SCHOOL: $227,823 · OtherMT MADONNA SCHOOLMPUSD FUND: $25,000 · Other+65 more: $68,600 · Other+65 moreTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $150,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY CORP…SRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · ReligionGLIDE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH: $1,000 · Human ServicesInsight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project: $600 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100 · Human ServicesKala Art Institute: $500 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $200 · Arts & CultureFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $400 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $100 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 · InternationalNAMI National: $300 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · Health
Other$709,384Education$150,000Religion$2,000Human Services$1,700Arts & Culture$700International$700Health$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMount Madonna Institute: $387,961 over 8y, 36% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $7,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKala Art Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING MATTERS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mount Madonna Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Insight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project ↗
  • Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Kala Art Institute ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tomash Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tomash Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tomash Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Tomash Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tomash Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph