Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Todi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.3MEducation$1.5MReligion$1.3MInternational$302kHuman Services$77kHealth$65kFood & Nutrition$16kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $143k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$21,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APNA GHAR INC$750,000
INDUS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$450,000
VIDYA BHARATI FOUNDATION INC$400,000
Individual grant recipient$143,250
BHARATIYA TEMPLE$46,971
SUPPORT A CHILD$27,000
INDIA DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF FUND$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SHRI GRAMEEN FOUNDATION$21,000
AROGYA FOUNDATION OF INDIA$19,000
SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS$10,000
KANKURGACHI$6,300
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$4,237
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ARSHA VIDYA PITHAM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
KS
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 12 repeat orgs$486k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$5.5M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+20%

Still filing today

25%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    APNA GHAR INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +80% · 26% of their budget
  • SA
    SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • AI
    AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • PS
    PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
2
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
4
Ensaaf

Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…

International
5
Indians for Collective Action

ICA's mission is to support sustainable development in India by partnering with dedicated non-government organizations (NGO's) and individuals.

Civil Rights
6
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
7
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
8
International Village Clinic

To provide health and medical services consisting of curative, educational and preventative programs to the rural population of india, without bringing a religious or political agenda.

International
9
Maharat for Development

Maharat for development works to engage and inspire individuals by monitoring the freedom of expression and providing evidence-based news and information through creating and continuously updating a database of freedom of expression…

Education
10
Ashra Charitable Fund Inc

Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.

International
11
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
12
Sewa International Inc

The organization's objective is to serve humanity in distress, aid local communities,and promote volunteerism in pursuit of its vision of a world of equality where everyone is happy,enjoying good health, and living in harmony with nature.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India; the most unlike its peers is Love to Langa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BHARATIYA TEMPLE INC: $1,255,548 · OtherBHARATIYA TEMPLE INCVIDYA BHARATI FOUNDATION INC: $775,000 · OtherVIDYA BHARATI FOUNDATION INCINDUS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $460,000 · OtherINDUS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $375,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $143,250 · OtherEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Other+25 more: $428,354 · Other+25 moreAPNA GHAR INC: $2,300,000 · Housing & ShelterAPNA GHAR INCINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $172,500 · InternationalSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $30,000 · InternationalAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $29,000 · InternationalSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $10,000 · InternationalLove to Langa: $10,000 · InternationalPhilabundance: $15,000 · Food & NutritionBHARATIYA CULTURAL CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $4,237 · HealthINTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Human Services
Other$3,557,152Housing & Shelter$2,300,000International$251,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$4,237Human Services$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPNA GHAR INC: $2,300,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $172,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $29,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPhilabundance: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLove to Langa: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBHARATIYA CULTURAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $4,237 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HORIZONS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMANNA ON MAIN STREET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
  • Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Love to Langa ↗
  • Who funds BHARATIYA CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ13.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Todi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Todi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Todi Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Todi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Todi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph