· Private foundation
The Todi Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $174k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $143k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APNA GHAR INC | $750,000 |
| INDUS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $450,000 |
| VIDYA BHARATI FOUNDATION INC | $400,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $143,250 |
| BHARATIYA TEMPLE | $46,971 |
| SUPPORT A CHILD | $27,000 |
| INDIA DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF FUND | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| SHRI GRAMEEN FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| AROGYA FOUNDATION OF INDIA | $19,000 |
| SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS | $10,000 |
| KANKURGACHI | $6,300 |
| MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL | $4,237 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| ARSHA VIDYA PITHAM | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AGAPNA GHAR INC4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +80% · 26% of their budget
- SASHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +12%
- AIAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD2× · 2023–2024 · $29k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- JHJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $50k
- PSPARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.
Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…
ICA's mission is to support sustainable development in India by partnering with dedicated non-government organizations (NGO's) and individuals.
Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.
To provide health and medical services consisting of curative, educational and preventative programs to the rural population of india, without bringing a religious or political agenda.
Maharat for development works to engage and inspire individuals by monitoring the freedom of expression and providing evidence-based news and information through creating and continuously updating a database of freedom of expression…
Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.
SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.
The organization's objective is to serve humanity in distress, aid local communities,and promote volunteerism in pursuit of its vision of a world of equality where everyone is happy,enjoying good health, and living in harmony with nature.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India and the most unlike its peers is Love to Langa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
- Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds Love to Langa ↗
- Who funds BHARATIYA CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET ↗
- Who funds NORTH PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Todi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Todi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Todi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.