Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Todd Brock Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$369k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.3MReligion$1.9MInternational$502kHuman Services$412kRecreation & Sports$289kHousing & Shelter$75kCivil Rights$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
  • $250k+3 grants · $919k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE$369,100
FOR ALL MANKIND MOVEMENT INC$300,000
DARE 2 SHARE$250,000
RESCUE INTERNATIONAL$125,000
FAMILY LEGACY MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL$25,548
BREAKAWAY MINISTRIES$25,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$20,000
ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$10,000
HOUSTON MUSUEM OF NATURAL SCIENCE$10,000
MEMORIAL VILLAGE POLICE FOUNDATION$10,000
HOPE CITY$4,414
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $369k → 4%MEMORIAL VILLAGE POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%MEMORIAL VILLAGE POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%MEMORIAL VILLAGE POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.8M · 17 repeat orgs$798k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$5.8M
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+20%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $534k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The For All Mankind Movement Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +313%
  • D2
    Dare 2 Share Ministries
    2× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +71%
  • TA
    Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $200k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SO
    STAR OF HOPE MISSION
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -60%
  • SB
    SECOND BAPTIST SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +95%
  • LH
    Life Housegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue ×12 · 48% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
6
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Master's University and Seminary

The Master's University and Seminary (TMUS) exists to advance the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ through education. This is accomplished through unreserved commitment to worshipping God, authority of Scripture, personal holiness, serving…

Education
9
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
10
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
11
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

12
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The for All Mankind Movement Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bright Mothers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#2#12#13#0#16
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%11%<5yr16%15%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%34%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr10%5%35–55yr13%37%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 34% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,771

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPE CITY - MEMORIAL CAMPUS — $3,223,000 · OtherHOPE CITY - MEMORIAL CAMPUSFamily Legacy Missions International — $357,413 · OtherFamily Legacy Missions InternationalDare 2 Share Ministries — $285,000 · OtherDare 2 Share Ministries+20 more — $250,452 · Other+20 moreThe For All Mankind Movement Inc — $1,408,200 · ReligionThe For All Mankind Movemen…RESCUE INTERNATIONAL — $125,000 · ReligionRESCUE INTERNATIONAL+6 more — $96,000 · Religion+6 moreFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $369,100 · Human ServicesMemorial Villages Police Foundation — $25,000 · Human ServicesLife House — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,600 · Human ServicesTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation — $199,650 · EducationSECOND BAPTIST SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $18,700 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $89,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterUnited in Purpose — $50,000 · Civil Rights
Other$4,115,865Religion$1,629,200Human Services$415,700Education$264,350Youth Development$89,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Civil Rights$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe For All Mankind Movement Inc — $1,408,200 over 7y, 17% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $369,100 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International — $357,413 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries — $285,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation — $199,650 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $89,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP UNIVERSITY — $49,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSECOND BAPTIST SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMemorial Villages Police Foundation — $25,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetLife House — $20,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetUNCHARTED MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $18,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY VILLAGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPursuit 53 — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE WELL INC — $8,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIKE EDEN MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetON EVERY WORD MINISTRIES — $4,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON — $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO22.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · GiveClear Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Servant Foundation · Lance Family Foundation · More Than The Move Foundation DBA Hope Legacy Collective · The Medallion Foundation Inc · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Todd Brock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Todd Brock Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Todd Brock Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph