· Private foundation
Lance Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC | $30,000 |
| AMAZON MISSION INC | $30,000 |
| E2 FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| KINGDOM ON THE MOVE CHURCH | $25,000 |
| KINGDOM LABS INC NFP | $10,000 |
| THE NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| ORBIS MINISTRIES INC | $10,000 |
| UNITED INDIAN MISSIONS INC | $10,000 |
| PURSUIT 53 | $10,000 |
| H4OPE | $5,000 |
| UNITED INDIAN MISSIONS INC | $5,000 |
| THE NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAMAZON MISSION FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $495k · revenue +43% · 79% of their budget
- EFE2 FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2025 · $124k · revenue +18% · 32% of their budget
- MPMission Pre-Born Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- ICINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -7%
- CTCONNECT THE WORLDone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -21%
- JAJESUS AND SCIENCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…
Training pastors in third world countries
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…
Train&equip leaders for churchs
Supporing missionaries worldwide
Religious
None
Training pastors and leaders in christian faith
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The for All Mankind Movement Inc and the most unlike its peers is Principle Based Leadership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMAZON MISSION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds E2 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
- Who funds Pursuit 53 ↗
- Who funds MARS HILL PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EVERY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECT THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds JESUS AND SCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORBIS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds The For All Mankind Movement Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUND THE TRUMPET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LAYMANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hope and Healing Center & Institute ↗
- Who funds PRINCIPLE BASED LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Sequoia Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds ENTRUSTED WORD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ONE FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds THAT DAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · The Todd Brock Family Foundation · Christian Brothers Automotive Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lance Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lance Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lance Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.