Skip to content
The Toby & Melvin Weinman Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Toby & Melvin Weinman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$313kHuman Services$294kEducation$114kReligion$86kCrime & Legal$65kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$28kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $145k
$17,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASSOCIATED$35,000
MENORAH LIFE FOUNDATION$30,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$30,000
Kirk P Gaddy Youth and Community Center$18,250
PIVOT INC$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Olympian Brotherhood of America$5,000
TOWSON UNIVERSITY$3,000
St Francis Academy$2,750
Clark University$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 19%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 19%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 19%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 19%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 19%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 25 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
20

Total granted

$1.2M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+36%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +120%
  • TU
    TOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $76k · revenue +76%
  • PI
    PIVOT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +471%

Funded once

  • MW
    Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • SF
    ST FRANCE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • RT
    RAW TRUST INC (STRONG CITY LEGAL)
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to solicit and receive contributions and grants from the general public and to hold, invest, and administer these funds and pay expenditures for the benefit of the university of maryland in baltimore and to…

Education
3
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
6
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is The Bethel Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ASSOCIATED: $350,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATEDMENORAH LIFE FOUNDATION: $180,950 · OtherMENORAH LIFE FOUNDATIONBETH EL CONGREGATION: $72,166 · OtherBETH EL CONGREGATIONTHE BABE RUTH BIRTHPLACE FOUNDATION INC: $26,720 · Other+26 more: $69,662 · Other+26 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES…TOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 · EducationFRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC: $7,500 · EducationGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $7,000 · Education+5 more: $5,250 · EducationPIVOT INC: $61,250 · Crime & LegalMENORAH MANOR FOUNDATION INC: $23,850 · HealthLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $10,000 · HealthMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthTRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBIT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,250 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $600 · Arts & CultureKIRK P GADDY YOUTH & COMMUNITY CENT: $18,250 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$699,498Human Services$270,000Education$95,750Crime & Legal$61,250Health$39,100Arts & Culture$33,850Youth Development$19,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $270,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPIVOT INC: $61,250 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BABE RUTH BIRTHPLACE FOUNDATION INC: $26,720 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMENORAH MANOR FOUNDATION INC: $23,850 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,576 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,250 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT BASKETS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE BABE RUTH BIRTHPLACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENORAH MANOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIRK P GADDY YOUTH & COMMUNITY CENT ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIT COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community F…T Rowe Price Program …The United Way of Cen…France-Merrick Founda…The Harry and Jeanett…The Joseph Meyerhoff …The Bunting Family Fo…Arbor Dog Foundation …Middendorf Foundation…Campbell Foundation I…The John J Leidy Foun…The Marion I & Henry …
Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · Arbor Dog Foundation Inc · Middendorf Foundation Inc · Campbell Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Toby & Melvin Weinman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Toby & Melvin Weinman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Casa of Baltimore County Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toby & Melvin Weinman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home