Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tobey Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$5.0MArts & Culture$170kEducation$59kYouth Development$52kHealth$40kHuman Services$26kInternational$25kReligion$23kOther$0
02FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k14 grants · $21k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.1M
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fidelity Charitable Fund$2,552,126
Fidelity Charitable Fund$1,577,593
The Buddy Program$3,000
Art Institute Of Chicago$2,500
Court Theatre$2,500
Kenilworth Union Church$2,500
North Shore Country Day School$1,500
Historic Preservation Foundation$1,500
Solti Foundation US$1,000
Journeycare Inc$1,000
Aspen Public Radio$1,000
Lincoln Park Zoo$1,000
Aspen Center for Environmental Studies$1,000
LEAP Learning Systems$1,000
Aspen Animal Shelter$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Glenkirk: $250 → 14%Journeycare Inc: $1k → 14%Journeycare Inc: $1k → 14%Youth Services of GlenviewNorthbrook: $8k → 14%Youth Services of GlenviewNorthbrook: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 54 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2020, 42 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
18

Total granted

$5.3M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+25%

Still filing today

57%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +29%
  • RF
    ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue +27%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SC
    Snowmass Chapel
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
11
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Wagner Farms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
32/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fidelity Charitable Fund: $4,899,719 · OtherFidelity Charitable Fund+49 more: $278,473 · Other+49 moreANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $65,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Orchestra: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCourt Theatre Fund: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ASPEN: $6,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,800 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $5,500 · Arts & CultureASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $111,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $7,500 · EducationGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $4,750 · EducationEnglish in Action: $4,500 · EducationLeap Learning Systems: $3,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $2,500 · EducationABC INC OF NEW CANAAN: $2,000 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF WAGNER FARMS: $1,000 · EducationAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · InternationalTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $7,500 · InternationalROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $17,000 · EnvironmentASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $1,000 · EnvironmentCATO INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Public BenefitBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $2,920 · Public Benefit
Other$5,178,192Arts & Culture$111,800Philanthropy$111,000Education$29,250International$25,000Environment$18,000Public Benefit$17,920

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $111,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $17,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE ASPEN: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $4,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEnglish in Action: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeap Learning Systems: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $2,920 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTART EARLY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABC INC OF NEW CANAAN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetElea Institute: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPINE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget626 LANDMARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGlenkirk: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ASPEN ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds English in Action ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Leap Learning Systems ↗
  • Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL22.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Bishop Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tobey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tobey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tobey’s filings →

More from the funding graph