· Private foundation
The TND Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $712k
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $526k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Roy Maas' Youth Alternatives Inc | $276,000 |
| Roy Maas' Youth Alternatives Inc | $250,000 |
| Family Violence Prevention Services Inc | $150,000 |
| Phoenix Center Camp Phoenix | $150,000 |
| HFCC Inc | $135,000 |
| I Care San Antonio Inc | $120,000 |
| Coastal Bend Community Foundation | $100,000 |
| Be Kind San Antonio Inc dba Snack Pak 4 Kids San Antonio | $100,000 |
| San Antonio Metropolitan Ministry Inc (SAMMinistries) | $100,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Alice | $86,000 |
| The Children's Hospital of San Antonio Foundation | $85,000 |
| St Jude's Ranch for Children -- Texas Region Inc | $85,000 |
| Haven for Hope of Bexar County | $80,000 |
| Texas A&M Foundation | $75,000 |
| Texas State Aquarium Institute for Wildlife Conservation | $64,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $595k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
Child Advocacy
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.
To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.
South Texas Rural Health Services, Inc. provides charitable health services, including the recruitment of health care personnel to the rural service area, and primarily serves the low income population.
Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…
To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
The mission of the sa cancer council is to provide financial resources for patient assistance services and cancer research to support the mays cancer center, home to ut health san antonio md anderson.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
Atcic's mission is to improve the lives of people affected by behavioral health and developmental and/or intellectual challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BEXAR COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FDN TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART ↗
- Who funds HFCC INC ↗
- Who funds I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALICE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEXAS DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE COASTAL BEND ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AGAPE RANCH ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Atascosa Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS RECOVERY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · HB Family Foundation · Tres Grace Family Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The TND Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The TND Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The TND Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.