Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thoracic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$2.1MScience & Tech$75kPhilanthropy$45kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$20kCommunity Improvement$17kInternational$8kEducation$7k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $460k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Migrant Clinician Network$50,000
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$35,000
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids$35,000
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$35,000
Children's Hospital 300 Longwood Ave Boston MA 02215$35,000
Compassion & Choices$35,000
Children's Hospital 300 Longwood Ave Boston MA 02215$30,000
Southcoast Hospital 101 Page Street New Bedford MA 02740$30,000
Children's Wisconsin Foundation$25,000
Health Resources in Action$25,000
University of California Berkeley$25,000
Vital CXNS$25,000
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids$25,000
Boston Community Pediatrics$25,000
Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Lamoille Family Center: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WI
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Thoracic Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 48%.

The Thoracic Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+47%

Still filing today

64%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +95%
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $295k · revenue +553%
  • MC
    MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $222k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • CH
    Cambridge Health Alliance
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • IS
    Ichahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1428 Madison Avenue New York NY
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • TS
    THE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
8
Beth Israel Lahey Health Primary Care

Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital (lahey…

—
9
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
10
Lahey Clinic Foundation Inc

The lahey clinic foundation, inc. (lcf) serves as the sole member and supports the lahey clinic (lc) and lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey hospital & medical center (lhmc), enabling lhmc and lc to provide superior health care leading to…

Health
11
Lahey Clinic Inc

Lahey clinic (lc) provides the highest quality interdisciplinary and coordinated patient care leading to the best possible outcomes and experiences for every patient, advancing medicine through research and educating tomorrow's health care…

Health
12
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids; the most unlike its peers is Newton San Juan Del Sur Sister City Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $370,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $295,000 · HealthCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDSMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC: $222,146 · HealthMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INCBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $105,000 · HealthBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INCFranciscan Hospital for Children: $90,000 · HealthFranciscan Hospital for Children+3 more: $69,855 · Health+3 moreChildren's Hospital 300 Longwood Ave Boston MA 02215: $210,000 · OtherChildren's Hospital 300 Longwood Ave Boston …Southcoast Hospital 101 Page Street New Bedford MA 02740: $140,000 · OtherSouthcoast Hospital 101 Page Street New Bedf…ASTHMA & ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER INC: $130,000 · OtherASTHMA & ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW E…University of California Berkeley: $75,000 · OtherUniversity of California BerkeleyIowa City Free Medical and Dental Clinic: $55,000 · OtherIowa City Free Medical and Dental ClinicChildren's Wisconsin Foundation: $50,000 · OtherChildren's Wisconsin FoundationCambridge Health Alliance: $35,000 · OtherIchahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1428 Madison Avenue New York NY: $35,000 · OtherTHE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $35,000 · OtherMass General Cardiothoracic Residency Program: $30,540 · Other+7 more: $113,800 · Other+7 moreCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $190,000 · Civil RightsCOMPASSIO…THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationLAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesNEWTON SAN JUAN DEL SUR SISTER CITY PROJECT INC: $8,448 · International
Health$1,152,001Other$909,340Civil Rights$190,000Education$45,000Human Services$20,000International$8,448

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $370,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $295,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC: $222,146 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetASTHMA & ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER INC: $130,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $105,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFranciscan Hospital for Children: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetVITAL CXNS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $24,855 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIOWA CITY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNEWTON SAN JUAN DEL SUR SISTER CITY PROJECT INC: $8,448 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds ASTHMA & ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Franciscan Hospital for Children ↗
  • Who funds THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds VITAL CXNS INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA CITY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON SAN JUAN DEL SUR SISTER CITY PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thoracic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thoracic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Lamoille Family Center Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Franciscan Hospital for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Thoracic Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Thoracic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thoracic’s filings →

More from the funding graph