· Private foundation
The Thomas G Woolford Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $754k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FURNITURE BANK OF METRO ATLANTA | $203,964 |
| WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER | $200,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA | $100,000 |
| YOUTH VILLAGES GEORGIA | $100,000 |
| ATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| THE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME | $50,000 |
| CHASTAIN PARK CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| DUNWOODY NATURE CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $419k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RWROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC3× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +62%
- LBLIFECYCLE BUILDING CENTER INC2× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue -48%
- GPGIGIS PLAYHOUSE ATLANTA2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $331k
- GAGREATER ATLANTA CHAMBER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $287k · revenue 0%
- GSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
The organization endeavors to make innovation a driver of a robust, inclusive cleantech economy that creates jobs in growth industries, commercializes technology that eliminates waste and pollution and creates more resilient communities in…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
Georgia Center for Opportunity GCO is an independent, non-partisan think tank dedicated to increasing opportunity and improving the quality of life for all Georgians.
The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…
Atlanta history center seeks to connect people, history, and culture to build a stronger community. through exhibitions, collections, historic houses, gardens, archives, educational school tours, public programs, and digital and virtual…
To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24
Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.
Atlanta habitat for humanity transforms communities by acting as a catalyst for neighborhood revitalization through education, innovative development, partnerships, and long term relationships with families.
Public Charter School
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Atlanta Chamber Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gracepoint School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ATLANTA CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE BANK OF METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Open Doors Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds GWINNETT CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GROVE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Technical College Foundation Incorporated ↗
- Who funds LIFECYCLE BUILDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Georgia ↗
- Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTTDALE EARLY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Outreach Home Inc ↗
- Who funds The William Breman Jewish Home Inc ↗
- Who funds The Forest School ↗
- Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Chastain Park Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE DEKALB INC ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds THE FRAZER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · The Imlay Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · J Bulow Campbell Foundation · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · James M Cox Foundation of Georgia Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Thomas G Woolford Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.