Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas E Jernigan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$628k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.0MAnimals$999kReligion$871kHuman Services$608kArts & Culture$578kEducation$333kPhilanthropy$296kRecreation & Sports$269kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $426k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $152k
$12,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUCKS UNLIMITED$51,597
Individual grant recipient$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$50,000
BRIDGEWAYS$32,000
REED GI CANCER RESEARCH$30,000
ST MARY'S ON THE HIGHLANDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$28,000
ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$28,000
KINGS HOME$25,000
COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$25,000
GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANCE SOCIETY$22,500
COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION OF ALABAMA$20,000
ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION$20,000
MAGIC MOMENTS$20,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$20,000
RISE PROGRAM$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $272k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%KINGS HOME: $30k → 7%OUTDOOR ABILITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%KINGS HOME: $30k → 7%KINGS HOME: $30k → 7%KINGS HOME: $25k → 7%KINGS HOME: $25k → 7%KINGS HOME: $25k → 7%KINGS HOME: $5k → 7%KULTURE CITY: $1k → 16%BROTHER BRYAN MISSION: $750 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 67 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
51

Total granted

$5.5M
$364k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+30%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +69%
  • KH
    Kings Home Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +99%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $161k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +254% · 39% of their budget
  • NH
    NICARAGUAN HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
2
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
3
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
4
Voices for Alabama's Children

Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
5
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
6
Nami Alabama Inc

Encourage and enhance advocacy and family support services on behalf of individuals suffering from mental illness.

Health
7
Alabama Sports Foundation Inc

Alabama sports foundation exists to optimize the athlete experience through performance, education, innovation, and implementation. alabama sports foundation does this with each individual by partnering with teams, clubs, and…

—
8
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

Environment
9
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

—
10
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
11
Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc

Serve kidney patients in Alabama by providing financial assistance, patient education, and support. Provide education and public awareness of causes and prevention of disease, as well as opportunity for organ donation. Provide support via…

Health
12
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Christopher Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
39/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUCKS UNLIMITED: $545,942 · OtherDUCKS UNLIMITEDST MARY'S ON THE HIGHLANDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $383,000 · OtherST MARY'S ON THE HIGHLANDS EPISCOPAL CHURCHST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $208,500 · OtherLINLEY HEFLIN FOUNDATION: $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $175,000 · OtherROBERT E REED FOUNDATION: $162,500 · Other+90 more: $2,329,975 · Other+90 moreALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $221,000 · AnimalsTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $122,650 · AnimalsBirmingham Zoo Inc: $85,000 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $161,000 · HealthMAGIC MOMENTS: $60,000 · HealthUNITED ABILITY INC: $45,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $42,500 · HealthLAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $27,500 · Health+8 more: $39,000 · HealthMCWANE SCIENCE CENTER: $90,600 · Arts & CultureALABAMA SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $82,500 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBirmingham Historical Society: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKings Home Inc: $170,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesGLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesOUTDOOR ABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,150 · Human ServicesBridgeways Inc: $145,600 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $103,500 · PhilanthropyQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $21,500 · Philanthropy
Other$4,244,917Animals$428,650Health$375,000Arts & Culture$330,100Human Services$272,150Youth Development$145,600Philanthropy$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $221,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetKings Home Inc: $170,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $161,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBridgeways Inc: $145,600 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $122,650 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $103,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMCWANE SCIENCE CENTER: $90,600 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc: $85,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALABAMA SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $82,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetON RIVER TIME: $80,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTHE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $77,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC: $65,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $61,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS: $60,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGLENWOOD INC: $51,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetAmerican Nicaraguan Foundation Inc: $49,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ABILITY INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $42,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA CASA NETWORK INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBirmingham Historical Society: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER: $22,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $21,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $16,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetGLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA: $10,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEWSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRESHWATER LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STATE OF ALABAMA BALLET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlabama Children's Hospital Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET GUILD OF BIRMINGHAM: $4,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMORRIS YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIAT: $3,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Sports Medicine Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTOPHER KIDS: $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS PLOTT FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKultureCity: $1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROTHER BRYAN MISSION: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Kings Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bridgeways Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA SPORTS HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds ON RIVER TIME ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGTIME MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Nicaraguan Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL53.9× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Protective Life Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Thomas H Lowder Family Foundation · The Hackney Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas E Jernigan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas E Jernigan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas E Jernigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph