· Private foundation
The Thomas and Tracey Gravina Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $322k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $100,000 |
| WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC | $88,333 |
| VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY | $78,350 |
| PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL | $55,000 |
| COBBS CREEK FOUNDATION | $35,200 |
| JEWISH HISTORY MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| BROTHERS OF THE ORDER OF HERMITS | $16,667 |
| PHILLYSAFE | $12,500 |
| WOMENS WAY | $10,000 |
| WEST PALM BEACH POLICE FUND INC | $10,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| INDEPENDENCE TRUST | $8,333 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $6,000 |
| THE PHILADELPHIA CITIZEN | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VUVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY5× · 2018–2024 · $689k · revenue +39%
- WPWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC3× · 2022–2024 · $255k · revenue +75%
- PYPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC5× · 2019–2024 · $200k · revenue +656%
Funded once
- WAWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +66%
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +33%- CCCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Cat Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
- Who funds THE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HAVERFORD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds West Palm Beach Police Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE DELAWARE VALLEY CHILDREN'S CHARITY ↗
- Who funds PHILLYSAFE ↗
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Coalition For Open Democracy ↗
- Who funds CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WOMENS WAY ↗
- Who funds KEN'S KREW ↗
- Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Forman Family Foundation · The Neubauer Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Sidney and Sandy Brown Foundation Inc · Poor Richard's Charitable Trust · The Green Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Thomas and Tracey Gravina Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Thomas and Tracey Gravina Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Thomas and Tracey Gravina Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.