· Private foundation
The Theodore H Barth Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $80k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $799k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $455k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION | $145,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION INC | $135,000 |
| WASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA | $75,000 |
| SOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | $50,000 |
| CLARK UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| CITY HARVEST INC | $32,500 |
| CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS | $32,500 |
| LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC | $30,000 |
| LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO | $30,000 |
| NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $30,000 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOODBANK | $27,500 |
| N STREET VILLAGE | $25,000 |
| SHAKESPEARE THEATRE | $25,000 |
| INSERIES OPERA | $25,000 |
| PROJECT RENEWAL INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION6× · 2019–2024 · $708k · revenue +25%
- WNWASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA5× · 2020–2024 · $350k · revenue +14%
- SHSOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEM INC3× · 2019–2021 · $235k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- TKTHE KENNEDY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTSone grant, 2019 · $151k
- ASARENA STAGE - OVATION COMPAIGNone grant, 2019 · $75k
- WOWILMER OPTHALMOLOGICAL INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of New Haven and the most unlike its peers is Urbanarias Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 63 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON THRIVE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY HUMOR INC ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JOBS INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Theodore H Barth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Stonehill College Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.