Skip to content
The Thebault Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Thebault Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$539k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$506k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Thebault Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’22
2
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$516kEducation$51kYouth Development$18kHealth$11kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$1k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $506k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc$505,601
Tri County Scholarship Fund$10,000
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc$5,295
The Peck School$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$5,000
Delbarton Fund$5,000
HARDING LAND TRUST$1,000
Cornerstone Family Programs$1,000
Mane Stream$500
GREATER NEWARD LIFECAMP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Cornerstone Family Programs: $1k → 4%GREATER NEWARD LIFECAMP: $500 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Jersey Public Charter Schools Association a Nj Non Profit Corporation

To advance educational choice for new jersey's children through quality public charter schools.

Education
2
Corporation for New Jersey Local Media

We build strong communities through journalism and civic engagement.

Public Benefit
3
Foundation for Hackettstown Medical Center

To serve the philanthropic needs for the Hackettstown Medical Center.

—
4
Christian School Association of North Central Jersey

In partnership with the Christian home and church, we strive to provide the finest Christ-centered education, equipping students to live productive, God-glorifying lives. We are a co-educational college prep school serving students from…

Education
5
New Jersey Food Council Inc

To provide vision and leadership to advance the interest of the food industry in new jersey.

—
6
New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute Inc

The Organization's mission is to improve the safety, quality, and affordability of healthcare for everyone.

—
7
Trenton Health Team Inc

Trenton Health Team's mission is to improve community health and well-being in the community of greater Trenton, New Jersey.

Health
8
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Human Services
9
The Craig School

To provide a strategy-based, comprehensive and challenging school experience for students with diagnosed learning disabilities

Education
10
Ridge and Valley Conservancy Inc

Ridge and valley conservancy is an accredited land trust that, in cooperation with strategic partners, permanently protects and stewards land in northwestern new jersey for the benefit of natural communities.

Environment
11
County College of Morris Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic gifts for the benefit of the college, its students and the community.

Education
12
Chemistry Council of New Jersey

To advance member interests, operational and environmental excellence, science,education, and community outreach in New Jersey.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Family Programs; the most unlike its peers is Harding Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $510,896 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDelbarton School: $20,700 · OtherDelbarton…THE PECK SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherTHE PECK …Greater Newark LifeCamp: $8,000 · OtherGreater N…Delbarton Fund: $5,000 · OtherDelbarton…+1 more: $500 · OtherTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · EducationFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIFE CAMP INC: $500 · Human ServicesHARDING LAND TRUST: $1,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$515,896Other$49,200Education$10,000Health$10,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$1,500Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $510,896 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PECK SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARDING LAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CAMP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMane Stream Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Brian Thebault Family…The Fournier Family F…Wicks Chapin IncHealey Family Foundat…Fm Kirby Foundation I…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Brian Thebault Family Foundation Inc · The Fournier Family Foundation · Wicks Chapin Inc · Healey Family Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thebault Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thebault Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Life Camp Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs: 3% of income from government
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thebault Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home