· Private foundation
The Ted and Lorraine Glasrud Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of THE TED AND LORRAINE GLASRUD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $270k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS HURRICANE FUND | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| MARTIN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COE FUND COE COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA | $20,000 |
| ST MARY'S FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| BIG BRO BIG SIS OF MARTIN COUNTY | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY | $15,000 |
| MOLLY'S HOUSE | $15,000 |
| WHITE BEAR LAKE AREA EDUCATION FOUN | $15,000 |
| TYKES AND TEENS | $13,000 |
| MISS INC | $12,500 |
| HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER | $12,000 |
| WITH ALL | $11,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBanner Health Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $631k · revenue +220%
- MHMOLLY'S HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +39%
- TTTYKES & TEENS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- KCKeystone Community Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +142%
- ECEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF THE TREASURE COASTINCone grant, 2017 · $10k
- TBTHE BOARD OF VISITORSone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
To promote a culture of environmental stewardship through volunteer and educational opportunities.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota private business council fights to advance policies that grow minnesota jobs and to elect public officials committed to joining with us.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Martin County and the most unlike its peers is Twin Cities Public Television Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Martin Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MOLLY'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TYKES & TEENS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE CENTER 4 AUTISM - FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Library Foundation of Martin County ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds WITHALL ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DOGS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds MILK AND HONEY MISSIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BELWIN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Hobe Sound Community Chest Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ted and Lorraine Glasrud Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.