How much did THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2022?

Human Services$273kHealth$142kEducation$93kRecreation & Sports$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kArts & Culture$30kYouth Development$21kPhilanthropy$16kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$251k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

recreation disabledcamp leadershipleadership specializedspecialized carecare campersvalleymedically fragile

2019

classcamp leadershipleadership specializedspecialized carecare campersrecreation disabledmedically

2020

recoveryfirefighters burnsacramento fireburn treatmentpositively impactimpact livesbarry scholarship

2021

learning

2022

funpeerweekendsafe environmentgrowthgetfree

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k9 grants · $71k
$10k–50k15 grants · $283k
$50k–250k1 grant · $55k

$13,629

Median grant

States reached

$3.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK$55,225
CAMP OKIZU$41,970
CELIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORCAL$35,442
FIRE FIGHTERS BURN INSTITUTE$24,835
SUNBURST PROJECTS$20,248
REINS IN MOTION FOUND$20,000
JACK'S HELPING HAND$19,500
GO BEYOND$16,534
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$15,940
CAMP WINNING HANDS$15,908
VESTIA$15,000
SHARED ADVENTURES$13,867
KARA$13,629
DIABETES YOUTH FAMILIES$10,024
RUNNING WITH LOVE INC$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$614k · 25 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$614k

$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

+33%

Still filing today

88%

65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JH
Jacks Helping Hands
8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +130%
EN
EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK
5× · 2018–2024 · $95k · revenue +149% · 46% of their budget
RI
Reins in Motion Foundation
7× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +19%

Funded once

TF
Tools for Peacegraduated
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +116%
YH
Youth Homes
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
RW
RUNNING WITH LOVE INC
one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health

University of California

To raise and manage private funds to support uci's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service.

Education

Hearts Aligned Inc

We help families with critically ill children living in Santa Barbara County by providing financial assistance, personal support and patient advocacy.

Health

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health

Support for Families of Children with Disabilities

To ensure that families of children with any kind of disability or special health care need have the knowledge and support to make informed choices that enhance their childs development and well being. Through fostering partnerships among…

Human Services

Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement

Easter Seals Central California

Easter seals central california provides innovative services for children and adults with disabilities and their families so that they may actively participate in the community with freedom to choose how they live, learn, work and play.

Health

Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights

San Diego Center for Children

Provides evidence based mental, emotional, behavioral disorder services to children & families.

Human Services

Parents & Friends Inc

To provide opportunities for people with developmental challenges and similar needs.

Human Services

Nbia Disorders Association

In our drive to find a cure for NBIA we provide support to families educate the public and accelerate research with collaborators from around the world.

Health

California Parenting Institute

CPI is a parent education and children's mental health agency, serving families throughout sonoma county since 1978. Our mission is to end child abuse and strengthen the health of children, parents, and families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dyf and the most unlike its peers is Hemophilia Foundation of Northern. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/68

the rest of the field

12%

10,805/89,248

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

55/57

Grantees still filing

38/57

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$273,311Other$299,165Health$142,141Education$93,337Recreation & Sports$61,774Public Safety & Disaster$45,800Arts & Culture$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA21.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · California Foundation For · Barney & Barney Foundation · Charis Fund · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 481301380 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 46% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Taylor Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Taylor Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Taylor Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Taylor Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph