Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Strauss Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$518kInternational$221kEducation$36kHealth$13kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$21,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF THE WEST SIDE$22,100
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC$21,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
YM & YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YM&YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $2k → 17%YM&YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $2k → 17%YM&YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $2k → 17%YM&YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $2k → 17%YM&YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $2k → 17%YM & YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $1k → 17%YM & YWHA OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$750k · 10 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$750k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+908%

Still filing today

40%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +57%
  • AJ
    ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +66%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS & YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSO OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS AND INWOOD INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • ST
    STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue ×15
  • IH
    ISRAELI HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Yeshivat Kadimah High School

To instill in its students a personal love for and commitment tohashem, the study and practice of torah, halacha, and jewish values asa way of life, and a love for the state of israel and the jewishpeople.

—
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Yeshiva University High Schools

The yeshiva university high schools has as its educational mission to teach and perpetuate the values of torah and secular studies. see schedule o.

Education
7
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
Jewish Year Abroad

To provide an education based program in israel for college age jewish young adults that will instill students with a sense of purpose, commitment & pride about

International
10
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
11
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael of Atlanta Inc

Inspire and assist each student in his quest to nurture a personal relationship with hashem, develop and refine his character, immerse himself in serious torah scholarship and attain the knowledge and skills necessary to be an articulate…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Institute for the Advancement of Education in Jaffa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creative Visions Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST SIDE INC: $288,625 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST SIDE INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC: $172,900 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INCEDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OHOLEI TORAH OF BROOKLYN INC: $28,300 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY: $21,680 · Other+9 more: $67,455 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA: $200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNI…+1 more: $500 · InternationalSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $12,600 · EducationTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationYOUNG MENS & YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSO OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS AND INWOOD INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $1,000 · Religion
Other$578,960International$200,500Philanthropy$20,000Education$14,600Human Services$11,000Arts & Culture$1,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA: $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $12,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS & YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSO OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS AND INWOOD INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA ↗
  • Who funds STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS & YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSO OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS AND INWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Strauss Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Strauss Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Strauss Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Strauss Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Strauss’ filings →

    More from the funding graph