Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Story Garschina Foundation Co Kenneth Garschina

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$9.5MPhilanthropy$4.0MCivil Rights$2.6MHealth$1.7MPublic Benefit$1.6MArts & Culture$1.4MSocial Science$1.2MYouth Development$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.8M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$1,961,000
EXETER ACADEMY$600,000
TENEO NETWORK$250,000
NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$200,000
DOMINICAN HOUSE OF STUDIES (THOMISTIC INSTITUTE)$150,000
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE$150,000
WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE$125,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES & LETTERS$125,000
LOG CABIN INSTITUTE$100,000
CITIZENS ALLIANCE INC$100,000
MANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
GRAMERCY PARK BLOCK ASSOCIATION$50,000
PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $227k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%New Story Inc: $7k → 10%Wig Out: $10k → 16%CARRIED TO FULL TERM: $50k → 7%Wig Out: $10k → 16%Wig Out: $5k → 16%ART 2 HEART: $10k → 13%SAFE HORIZON: $20k → 17%The Innocence Project: $50k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
DE
AZ
NC
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of The Story Garschina Foundation Co Kenneth Garschina’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Story Garschina Foundation Co Kenneth Garschinalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 32 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
42

Total granted

$14M
$5.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

84%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +37%
  • TF
    THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.6M · revenue +11%
  • LV
    LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +294%

Funded once

  • University of Chicago
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue +21%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -32%
  • TS
    The Story Garschina Charitable Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $635k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
6
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Berggruen Institute
Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies and the most unlike its peers is The Neue Galerie New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/59
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,506

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/58
Grantees still filing
47/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $1,600,000 · OtherTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC P…LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $1,215,000 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECO…THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL — $1,101,750 · OtherTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOLYoung America's Foundation — $650,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationThe Story Garschina Charitable Fund — $635,000 · OtherThe Story Garschina Charitable FundEXETER ACADEMY — $600,000 · OtherEXETER ACADEMYTHE 85 FUND — $550,000 · OtherTHE 85 FUND+43 more — $3,263,500 · Other+43 morePHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $3,765,466 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMYUniversity of Chicago — $1,500,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $600,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEWitherspoon Institute Inc — $375,000 · Education+5 more — $730,000 · Education+5 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,961,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTH…+1 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropyPennys Flight Foundation Inc — $575,000 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $310,000 · HealthPETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $80,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $50,000 · Health+4 more — $65,000 · HealthMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $762,500 · Public BenefitCONSUMERS' RESEARCH INC — $250,000 · Public BenefitMANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC — $835,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $250,500 · Arts & CultureGRAMERCY PARK BLOCK ASSOC INC — $180,000 · Arts & CultureLOG CABIN INSTITUTE — $100,000 · Arts & CultureThe Ballroom Cultural Arts Foundation — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DRAWING CENTER INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$9,615,250Education$7,970,466Philanthropy$3,964,000Health$1,080,000Public Benefit$1,012,500Youth Development$845,000Arts & Culture$760,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,961,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $3,765,466 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $1,600,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $1,215,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL — $1,101,750 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC — $835,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $762,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $650,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $600,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPennys Flight Foundation Inc — $575,000 over 3y, 77% of budgetTHE 85 FUND — $550,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWitherspoon Institute Inc — $375,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $310,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $250,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCONSUMERS' RESEARCH INC — $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAMERCY PARK BLOCK ASSOC INC — $180,000 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $170,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetCitizens' Alliance Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetLOG CABIN INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL — $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA WOMEN AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWig Out — $25,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEUE GALERIE NEW YORK — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART 2 HEART — $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Donors Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Story Garschina Foundation Co Kenneth Garschina funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Bottom Line Inc0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph