· Private foundation
The Stimson-Miller Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $261k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAREER PATH SERVICES | $30,000 |
| KANIKSU LAND TRUST | $26,009 |
| PORTLAND YOUTHBUILDERS | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| SAFE PASSAGE (THE WOMEN'S CENTER) | $20,000 |
| PARKINSONS RESOURCES OF OREGON | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY CANCER SERVICES | $20,000 |
| CLATSKANIE FARMER COLLECTIVE | $16,750 |
| YES (YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES) OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY | $15,000 |
| SELKIRK OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP & EDUCATION (SOLE) | $15,000 |
| BANKS SCHOOL DISTRICT #13 | $15,000 |
| NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS | $13,510 |
| NORTHEAST YOUTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| OREGON FFA FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHILD ABUSE ASSESSM2× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +179%
Portland YouthBuilders3× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +35%- OTOregon Tradeswomen Inc2× · 2020–2022 · $32k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- GCGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue +5%
- MIMULTICARE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $30k
- PSPLUMMER-WORLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT #44one grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.
Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
Elevating potential, building sustained relationships with urban youth, and charting paths to brighter futures.
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bradley Angle and the most unlike its peers is Thrive International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kaniksu Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Cancer Services Inc ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY CHILD ABUSE ASSESSM ↗
- Who funds Portland YouthBuilders ↗
- Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Oregon Tradeswomen Inc ↗
- Who funds CAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds SMART READING ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEMONADE INC ↗
- Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds LATINOBUILT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASHLEY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESOURCES LEGAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds FOOD ROOTS ↗
- Who funds CLATSKANIE FARMER COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds INCIGHT COMPANY ↗
- Who funds REACH NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds YES OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WORLD FORESTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friends of Family Farmers ↗
- Who funds CROSS THE DIVIDE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Braemar Charitable Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stimson-Miller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
- Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp — 18% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Friends of Family Farmers — 9% of income from government
- The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Children's Healing Art Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Neskowin Coast Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Chess for Success — 2% of income from government
- Latinobuilt Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Food Roots — 0% of income from government
- World Forestry Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stimson-Miller Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Stimson-Miller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.