Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$731k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.9MArts & Culture$2.3MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$728kFood & Nutrition$492kYouth Development$369kRecreation & Sports$287kHousing & Shelter$211kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $367k
  • $250k+1 grant · $731k
$52,398
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 97% of reported assets are held in Markel Corp.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL$731,209
THE MAYMONT FOUNDATION$104,797
YWCA$104,797
VPM$52,398
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER RICHMOND$52,398
THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$52,398
SPORTS BACKERS$34,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $911k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YWCA OF RICHMOND: $254k → 22%THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $52k → 9%THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $51k → 9%THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $48k → 9%THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $46k → 9%YWCA OF RICHMOND: $10k → 22%THE VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $41k → 9%YWCA OF RICHMOND: $10k → 22%YWCA OF RICHMOND: $10k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $51k → 22%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $106k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $73k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $51k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $26k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 9%SPORTABLE: $25k → 22%SPORTABLE: $15k → 22%SPORTABLE: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 40%.

The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 57% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 28 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$8.6M
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+21%

Still filing today

86%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL
    3× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +73%
  • TV
    THE VALENTINE MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +176%
  • MF
    MAYMONT FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • BH
    BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $103k
  • JF
    Jewish Family Services Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $51k · revenue +21%
  • ET
    EXCEL TO EXCELLENCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of Richmond County
—
2
Renew Richmond

Renew Richmond strives to build healthier, more self-empowered communities by involving local youth in agriculture and environmental sustainability. We do this by partnering with local public schools.

Environment
3
The Richmond Symphony

The richmond symphony performs, teaches and champions music to inspire and unite our communities.

Arts & Culture
4
Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce

Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.

—
5
Richmond County Partnership for Children Inc

Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…

Education
6
Nextup Rva

To provide all richmond youth with access to coordinated, high-quality learning experiences beyond the classroom. we believe that when students participate in high-quality out-of-school time (ost) programs, they benefit academically,…

Human Services
7
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
8
Groundwork Rva Inc

Mission: to cultivate the next generation of urban conservationists in richmond, virginia. vision: groundwork rva works with richmond youth to increase environmental, economic, and social well-being in neighborhoods by transforming…

Community Improvement
9
Greater Richmond Partnership Inc

GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.

Public Benefit
10
The Richmond Forum

To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead.

—
11
Virginia Center for Public Press

Vcpp operates wrir 97.3 lpfm, a community low power fm radio station serving citizens of the city of richmond, virginia, and surrounding counties. the station covers a listening area of approximately 5-7 miles. wrir broadcasts news, views…

Arts & Culture
12
Richmond Friends School Inc

Committed to providing a quality educational experience for each child, creating an environment that nurtures individual intellectual, emotional, creative, spiritual, and physical gifts within a community

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childsavers- Memorial Child Guidance Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Excel to Excellence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $1,140,213 · Arts & CultureTHE VALENTINE MUSEUMMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $1,062,375 · Arts & CultureMAYMONT FOUNDATION+3 more: $97,500 · Arts & CultureANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL: $1,410,798 · EducationANNA JULIA COOPER SCH…Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc: $176,245 · EducationCristo Rey Richmond H…ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER: $115,000 · EducationST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationREYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $704,914 · OtherREYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCA…CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $365,544 · OtherCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUID…VPM: $153,121 · OtherVPMYWCA: $104,797 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $102,716 · OtherRICHMOND FIRST TEE: $227,098 · OtherRICHMOND FIRST TEEBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND: $126,627 · OtherMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS: $217,234 · OtherMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BAC…CARITAS: $106,004 · OtherRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100,157 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE: $107,632 · OtherOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $86,282 · Other+7 more: $170,730 · Other+7 morePETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $295,568 · Human ServicesPETER PAUL …YWCA RICHMOND: $283,726 · Human ServicesYWCA RICHMO…VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $238,544 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA HO…Jewish Family Services Inc: $50,673 · Human ServicesJewish Fami…SPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $42,000 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED: $272,594 · HealthHOPE REINS: $195,999 · HealthThe Virginia Home: $150,505 · HealthFEED MORE INC: $492,432 · Food & NutritionRISE RICHMOND INC: $407,099 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$2,300,088Education$1,707,043Other$2,572,856Human Services$910,511Health$619,098Food & Nutrition$492,432Crime & Legal$407,099

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL: $1,410,798 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $1,140,213 over 7y, 10% of budgetMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $1,062,375 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $492,432 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRISE RICHMOND INC: $407,099 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $365,544 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $295,568 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetYWCA RICHMOND: $283,726 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED: $272,594 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $238,544 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetRICHMOND FIRST TEE: $227,098 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS: $217,234 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE REINS: $195,999 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCristo Rey Richmond High School Inc: $176,245 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetThe Virginia Home: $150,505 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND: $126,627 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER: $115,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE: $107,632 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCARITAS: $106,004 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100,157 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $86,282 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetART 180 Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc: $50,673 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEXCEL TO EXCELLENCE INC: $45,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $42,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE CYCLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUP RVA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND FIRST TEE ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS ↗
  • Who funds HOPE REINS ↗
  • Who funds Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Virginia Home ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ART 180 Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds EXCEL TO EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE CYCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds UP RVA ↗
  • Who funds VPM MEDIA CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA44.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Herndon Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · Robins Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Steven & Katherine Markel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steven & Katherine Markel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph