· Private foundation
The Stephen a and Diana L Goldberg Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k8 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $100,000 |
| ST ALBANS SCHOOL FOR BOYS | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE | $50,000 |
| THE MIRIAM HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| THE WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING | $20,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN DC INC | $20,000 |
| WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL | $10,000 |
| EDMUND BURKE SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL CATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR GIRLS | $5,000 |
| YELLOWSTONE FOREVER | $5,000 |
| HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| CITIZEN'S ASSOCIATION OF GEORGETOWN | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $4.9M · revenue +95%
CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC5× · 2017–2021 · $650k · revenue +50%
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- ACAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEIZMANNone grant, 2019 · $50k
- BSBIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +42%
- TMTHE MIRIAM HOSPITAL-CANCER CENTER EMPLOYEE EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2019 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children
Vcu health children's services at brook road (csbr), fka crippled children's hospital, is a resource and provider of specialized medical services customized to meet the specific needs of children and their families.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…
Strengthening baltimore's communities through education, skills development and community service.
Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds EDMUND BURKE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Miriam Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING ↗
- Who funds SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
- Who funds GROW SMART RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds SILO RIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Bozeman Deaconess Foundation ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds Citizens Association of Georgetown ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · Sanford and Doris Slavin Foundation Inc · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Nora Roberts Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stephen a and Diana L Goldberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safe Kids Worldwide — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stephen a and Diana L Goldberg Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Stephen a and Diana L Goldberg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.