Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stein Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$2.0MHealth$1.2MEducation$332kRecreation & Sports$250kHuman Services$76kInternational$54kYouth Development$53kPhilanthropy$52kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$5,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINTS BRIGADE$100,000
BACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC$50,000
LARRY PROUT JR - THE BEAR - COURAGE FUND$11,111
HEART CARE INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTH$5,400
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK$5,000
ALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC$2,500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$2,500
JCCA EDENWALD INC$1,800
JCCA EDENWALD INC$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $100k → 11%THE TWIG CARES INC: $1k → 9%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA: $10k → 13%BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK INC: $3k → 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $3k → 11%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK INC: $3k → 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $3k → 11%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES I: $3k → 8%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES I: $3k → 8%BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK INC: $3k → 8%IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $3k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YO: $16k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YO: $15k → 17%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $10k → 9%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YO: $10k → 17%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5k → 9%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5k → 9%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YO: $10k → 17%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5k → 9%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5k → 9%YOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Stein Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Stein Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 30 repeat orgs$949k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
33

Total granted

$3.0M
$929k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+8%

Still filing today

90%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    Saints Brigade
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +50% · 99% of their budget
  • BS
    BACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $132k · revenue +143%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $105k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DAPPER MCDONALD ALS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue -99% · 63% of their budget
  • CJ
    CHELSEA JEWISH GREEN HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +47%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - PENN
    one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
9
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Hope Network and the most unlike its peers is Scarlets Smile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesElementary Literacy TutoringEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%62%10–20yr19%14%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/64
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,696

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
37/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Saints Brigade — $1,950,000 · Arts & CultureSaints Brigade+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DAPPER MCDONALD ALS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthTHE DAPPER MCDONALD…CHELSEA JEWISH GREEN HOUSE INC — $300,000 · HealthCHELSEA JEWISH GREE…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 · Health+9 more — $86,211 · Health+9 moreREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $425,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVE…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - PENN — $100,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…+26 more — $228,167 · Other+26 moreBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC — $132,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $100,000 · EducationNew York University — $25,000 · EducationBroward Education Foundation Inc — $25,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS — $17,500 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK — $50,974 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesHARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesBridges from School to Work Inc — $12,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human Services+3 more — $8,500 · Human ServicesGlobal Impact — $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 · InternationalHEART CARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,600 · InternationalTHE CHILDREN'S HOPE CHEST INC — $22,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$1,960,000Health$711,211Other$753,167Education$309,500Human Services$256,974International$53,600Philanthropy$53,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSaints Brigade — $1,950,000 over 8y, 99% of budgetTHE DAPPER MCDONALD ALS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetCHELSEA JEWISH GREEN HOUSE INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC — $132,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $105,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK — $50,974 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNew York University — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Impact — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOPE CHEST INC — $22,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetLARRY PROUT JR THE BEAR COURAGE FUND — $21,111 over 2y, 12% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENSACOLA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $16,667 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBridges from School to Work Inc — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART CARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER HOPE NETWORK — $10,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget1199 SEIU HOME CARE INDUSTRY EDUCATION F — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJCCA EDENWALD — $8,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLISA B FISHMAN FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ANN ARBOR — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAPROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Debra and Kenneth Cap…National Philanthropi…Jewish Communal FundEnterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…
Debra and Kenneth Caplan FoundationDE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Debra and Kenneth Caplan Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stein Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Chelsea Jewish Green House Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc — 28% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stein Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stein Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines