· Private foundation
The Steele Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $140k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY | $20,000 |
| SOMOS AMIGOS MEDICAL MISSIONS | $20,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA BARBARA | $10,000 |
| LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC | $10,000 |
| BHUTAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WORLD WOMEN WORK | $10,000 |
| ENSEMBLE THEATRE | $10,000 |
| SUDDEN ARRHYTHMIA DEATH SYNDROMES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SARAH HOUSE | $5,000 |
| FR VIRGIL CORDANO CENTER | $5,000 |
| MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST | $5,000 |
| CAPITOL HILL ARTS WORKSHOP | $5,000 |
| MAPWORKS LEARNING | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
117 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +14%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +87%
- TBThe Bhutan Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- MUMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $10k
- CCCORVALLIS-BENTON COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2019 · $5k
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Strengthening baltimore's communities through education, skills development and community service.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for Others Inc and the most unlike its peers is Benton Furniture Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds The Bhutan Foundation ↗
- Who funds Earth Sangha ↗
- Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE OCEAN INC ↗
- Who funds WORLDWOMENWORK ↗
- Who funds BENTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds DUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL HILL ARTS WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
- Who funds NBCC ↗
- Who funds Common Good City Farm ↗
- Who funds THE WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MALAWI CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds WORDDANCETHEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds CITY BLOSSOMS INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AHEAD WITH HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds SOMOS AMIGOS MEDICAL MISSIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Santa Barbara Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Patricia Bragg Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Steele Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc — 38% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Star Community Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.