Loading…
· Private foundation
THE SRICHARD AND PATRICIA R PENNI CHARITABLE FOU
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$56k
Granted FY2024
34
Grants
15
Communities
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of THE SRICHARD AND PATRICIA R PENNI CHARITABLE FOU’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
cancermedical
2019
cancer
2020
little
2021
little
2022
operationchurchseminarylittle
2023
operationseminarylittlesisters
2024
operationseminarylittle
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 34 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- REGIS COLLEGE$5,000
- BOSTON COLLEGE HS$5,000
- ST MARY OF THE ASSUMPTION$4,975
- WEBSTER HOUSE$3,500
- CATHOLIC APPEAL$3,500
- ST JOAN OF ARC PARISH$2,800
- BOSTON COLLEGE$2,500
- MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$2,500
- SMILE TRAIN$2,000
- BOYSTOWN$1,500
- HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
- ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,500
- CAMP ALLEN$1,500
- ST JOSEPH PARISH$1,250
- ST ANDRE BESSETTE$1,200
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$291k · 37 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else
37 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
37
21
Total granted
$291k
$14k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+68%
+91%
Still filing today
24%
19%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthReligionPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWebster House8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +68%
- CMCatholic Medical Center4× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +11%
- CACamp Allen8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- KCKings Classical Academygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +91%
- SAST ANDRS BESSETTEone grant, 2022 · $1k
- PPancamone grant, 2023 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Christ's Hospital
—
2
The Christ Hospital
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
Health
3
New England Baptist Hospital
The mission of the new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is committed to improving the health of the communities served by providing high quality, personalized health care with compassion, dignity and respect for patient rights…
Health
4
Providence St Joseph Medical Center
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
5
Tufts Medical Center Physicians
The tufts medical center physicians organization, inc. coordinates the administrative and billing activities for the group practices in their mission of providing quality health care services to patients of tufts medical center, inc. and…
Health
6
Saint Francis Medical Center
The mission of saint francis medical center is to provide a ministry of healing, wellness, quality and love inspired by our faith in jesus christ.
Health
7
St Joseph's Medical Center
Throughout essentia health, we are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives. as a member of the essentia health family, st. joseph's medical center's mission as a catholic, benedictine sponsored facility is to promote christ's…
Health
8
St Francis Medical Center
To provide for the care of the ill, injured, or disabled persons (see schedule o) and to provide for the research, education, and the enhancement of health of those in northeast louisiana.
Health
9
St Catherine Hospital
For more than seventy years, St. Catherine Hospital's mission has been to serve families with quality health care in a Christian environment wherein the healing of the whole person can take place.
Health
10
Providence Saint John's Health Center
See schedule oas expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
11
Boston Center for Biblical Counseling
Philanthropy
12
Franciscan Health System
Fhs was founded on the principle to provide compassionate care to everyone regardless of ability to pay or social status. fhs includes multiple facilities and hospice, and an expanding network of clinics.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Kings Classical Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 63 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
11%
206,164/1,819,544
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$244,411Human Services$25,500Health$22,250Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$7,500Philanthropy$4,500Religion$3,800
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Webster House ↗
- Who funds Smile Train ↗
- Who funds Catholic Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Camp Allen ↗
- Who funds St Jude Childrens Research Hospital ↗
- Who funds REGIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Gary Sinise Foundation ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds Word on Fire ↗
- Who funds Kings Classical Academy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Amica Companies FoundationRI13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE SRICHARD AND PATRICIA R PENNI CHARITABLE FOU funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHUCKYS FIGHT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 264101912 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHUCKYS FIGHT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Srichard and Patricia R Penni Charitable Fou?
Find your warmest path to The Srichard and Patricia R Penni Charitable Fou through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines