Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sophie S Bass Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$382kAnimals$298kEducation$160kHuman Services$62kEnvironment$25kYouth Development$20kCrime & Legal$15kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$651k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION$25,000
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$20,000
CITY KIDS ADVENTURES$20,000
ONE SAFE PLACE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$776k · 9 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$776k
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +163%
  • TF
    THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +61%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    2× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPARD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -38%
  • GW
    GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
3
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
4
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
6
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation, chartered by congress, engages americans in community-based and national programs that promote the health and public enjoyment of the 193-million acre national forest system, and accepts and administers…

Recreation & Sports
7
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $146,000 · AnimalsTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIA…Wildlife Conservation Society — $138,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation SocietyTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Animals+1 more — $4,000 · AnimalsUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER — $101,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERGOOD SHEPARD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $100,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPARD EPISCOPAL SCHOOLNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $11,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $10,000 · OtherSafe City Commission — $15,000 · OtherSafe City CommissionGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT — $15,000 · OtherGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPOR…Save The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $147,250 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FO…MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $51,000 · EducationMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL IN…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $130,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDI…Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $5,000 · HealthTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST — $37,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EnvironmentCADDO LAKE INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentCity Kids Adventures — $20,000 · Youth Development
Animals$298,000Other$273,000Education$207,250Health$135,000Philanthropy$37,000Environment$25,000Youth Development$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $147,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $146,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $138,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $51,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST — $37,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSafe City Commission — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCADDO LAKE INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTurtles Fly Too Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sophie S Bass Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sophie S Bass Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sophie S Bass Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph