Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Soo Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$352kHealth$291kEducation$263kArts & Culture$132kInternational$99kPublic Safety & Disaster$90kRecreation & Sports$75kEnvironment$71kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$8,800
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Impact Missions Inc$54,000
Milarepa Osel Cho Dzong$24,000
North Carolina Botanical Garden Fnd$22,000
Yeshe Nyingpo Inc$20,000
American Red Cross$20,000
John Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center$12,000
Hirshberg Fnd for Pancreatic Resear$10,000
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network$10,000
Dudjom Foundation$8,800
Dispute Settlement Center$7,500
Homes of Hope India$5,000
Animal Protection Society of Durham$5,000
Religious Coalition for Nonviolent$3,000
Alliance Francaise of Raleigh-Durha$3,000
Ackland Art Museum$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hiranyagarbha Yuga Ashram: $3k → 13%Triangle Special Hockey Association: $20k → 8%Triangle Special Hockey Association: $20k → 8%Refugee Support Services: $5k → 10%Youth Villages: $4k → 12%Triangle Special Hockey Association: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
26

Total granted

$1.2M
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+57%

Still filing today

47%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $210k · revenue +145%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $183k · revenue +28%
  • DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +566%

Funded once

  • BT
    BSA Troop 951 Mount Pleasant UMC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc

To create a place of lifelong learning where people, from young child to senior citizen, embrace science as a way of knowing about themselves, their community, and their world.

Arts & Culture
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Davidson Day School

Davidson Day is a Pre-K through 12th grade college preparatory school located in Davidson, North Carolina. Davidson Day School fosters academic excellence through collaboration, creativity, and character development. Our vision is to be a…

Education
4
The Montessori School of Raleigh Inc

The montessori school of raleigh (msr) and carolina preparatory academy (carolina prep) are the triangle's modern embodiment and mindful practice of the time-proven montessori philosophy and the world-renowned international baccalaureate…

Education
5
Omni Montessori School

Omni Montessori School is dedicated to adhering to the teachings of Maria Montessori by providing a child-centered environment that offers an individualized and integrated curriculum for students age 3 - grade nine.

—
6
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education
7
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
8
Cannon School Inc

Provision of quality k12 educational program within a safe, diverse and challenging environment.

Education
9
Community School of Davidson Inc

Community school of davidson believes that every student can and will succeed in ways that reflect his or her own aptitudes and interests. our mission is to use the principles of "the basis school" to provide an optimum environment for…

Education
10
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
11
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
12
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unc Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hiranyagarbha Yuga Ashram. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHE NYING PO INCORPORATED: $214,500 · OtherYESHE NYING PO INCORPORATEDNorth Carolina Botanical Garden Fnd: $182,000 · OtherNorth Carolina Botanical Garden FndMILAREPA OSEL CHO DZONG: $101,500 · OtherMILAREPA OSEL CHO DZONGAmerican Red Cross: $75,000 · OtherAmerican Red CrossIMPACT MISSIONS: $54,000 · OtherIMPACT MISSIONSRALEIGH RADIANCE: $30,000 · Other+34 more: $224,260 · Other+34 moreUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES: $183,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL S…DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION+3 more: $17,500 · EducationTRIANGLE SPECIAL HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesHIRANYAGARBHA YUGA ASHRAM: $2,500 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalHOME OF HOPE INDIA - US: $3,500 · InternationalPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM: $10,000 · Animals
Other$881,260Education$440,500Human Services$71,000International$38,500Health$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES: $183,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOOD HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER FRIEN: $15,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetDURHAM LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATIONAL INFORMATION CORPORATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATURAL DHARMA FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLAZING WISDOM INSTITUTE: $4,080 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetCAROLINA PHILHARMONIC INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INDIA - US: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SONORAN DESERT ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE SPECIAL HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOOD HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER FRIEN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM ↗
  • Who funds DISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL DHARMA FELLOWSHIP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Durham Merchants Association Charitable Foundation · The Forest At Duke Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · Duke University · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Soo Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Soo Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Soo Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Soo Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph