Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Smith Martini Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$1.7MCrime & Legal$81kYouth Development$63kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kInternational$20kReligion$17kRecreation & Sports$15kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $266k
$66,231
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABCCM$200,000
Set Free Monterey Bay$66,231
Rancho Cieto$20,211
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FAMILY PLACE: $33k → 13%LAKE TOWAWAY CHARITIES: $53k → 13%LAKE TOWAWAY CHARITIES: $33k → 13%LAKE TOWAWAY CHARITIES: $28k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $25k → 13%LAKE TOWAWAY CHARITIES: $19k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +152% since the first grant, against +111% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$1.8M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+152%
+111%

Still filing today

67%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $265k · revenue +110%
  • LT
    LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES
    5× · 2019–2023 · $156k · revenue +168%
  • SF
    Set Free Monterey Bay
    2× · 2024–2025 · $81k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY IN
    one grant, 2021 · $58k
  • FP
    Family Place of Transylvania Countygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $33k · revenue +111%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc

Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.

Recreation & Sports
2
Trc the Recovery Center

Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.

Health
3
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
4
The Compass Center

Navigating the journey to healing for all affected by sexual, relational, and family trauma.

Crime & Legal
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
South Carolina Tennis Association Inc

To develop, maintain, and promote the game of tennis.

7
TransFamily Support Services

Provide services for transgender youth and adults

Human Services
8
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
9
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
10
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
11
Trec Community Investors

Trec community investors joins forces with underserved communities to invest in the disinvested, energize neighborhoods, and change lives. through access to flexible capital and real estate expertise, we make an unwavering commitment to…

Human Services
12
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transylvania County Rescue Squad Brevard and the most unlike its peers is Set Free Monterey Bay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ABCCM — $1,250,000 · OtherABCCMTRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC — $264,505 · OtherTRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INCTRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY IN — $57,500 · Other+10 more — $88,500 · OtherLAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES — $156,100 · Human ServicesLAKE TOXAW…Family Place of Transylvania County — $32,500 · Human ServicesFamily Pla…Set Free Monterey Bay — $80,731 · Crime & LegalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY INC — $42,500 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INC — $20,211 · Youth DevelopmentOklahoma Tennis Foundation — $13,500 · Recreation & SportsTRANSYLVANIA COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD BREVARD — $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC — $1,000 · Education
Other$1,660,505Human Services$188,600Crime & Legal$80,731Youth Development$62,711Recreation & Sports$13,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC — $264,505 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetLAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES — $156,100 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetSet Free Monterey Bay — $80,731 over 2y, 10% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY INC — $42,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFamily Place of Transylvania County — $32,500 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetOklahoma Tennis Foundation — $13,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD BREVARD — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRANSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES
  • Who funds Set Free Monterey Bay
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BREVARD TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Family Place of Transylvania County
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC
  • Who funds Oklahoma Tennis Foundation
  • Who funds BREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED
  • Who funds TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD BREVARD
  • Who funds SEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Pisgah Health Foundation · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Duke Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Smith Martini Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Smith Martini Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Smith Martini Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph