Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$146kHousing & Shelter$71kHealth$50kFood & Nutrition$24kEducation$22kReligion$19kPhilanthropy$12kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$881k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAWS$12,437
MY JOYFUL HEART$10,965
SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION$4,000
SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF SYLVANIA$4,000
NEVER ALONE FOOD PANTRY$4,000
JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE$4,000
TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE$3,500
OLLIE'S PLACE NYC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHRISTOPHER & DANA REEVE FOUNDATION$500
ST VINCENT DEPAUL GEORGIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 7%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 7%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 7%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 7%Joliet Area Community Hospice: $4k → 7%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $3k → 7%JOLIET AREA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $3k → 7%MORNING STAR MISSION: $4k → 7%ALMOST HOME CHICAGO: $6k → 14%MORNING STAR MISSION: $3k → 7%ALMOST HOME CHICAGO: $6k → 14%MORNING STAR MISSION: $3k → 7%ALMOST HOME CHICAGO: $4k → 14%MORNING STAR MISSION: $3k → 7%ALMOST HOME CHICAGO: $3k → 14%Morning Start Mission Ministries In: $1k → 7%Almost Home Chicago: $3k → 14%MY JOYFUL HEART: $13k → 7%ALMOST HOME CHICAGO: $2k → 14%MY JOYFUL HEART: $12k → 7%MY JOYFUL HEART: $11k → 7%MY JOYFUL HEART: $10k → 7%MY Joyful Heart: $9k → 7%MY JOYFUL HEART: $9k → 7%MY JOYFUL HEART: $9k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $5k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $4k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $4k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $4k → 7%Swift Outdoor Accessible Recreation: $4k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $3k → 7%SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $3k → 7%Family Services Foundation of New L: $1k → 7%My Joyful Heart: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
NJ
UT
TN
DC
OK
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 12 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$323k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

58%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    MY JOYFUL HEART NFP
    8× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +72%
  • TH
    THE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +105%
  • SO
    SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MS
    Morning Start Mission
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • FL
    FIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -37%
  • TS
    Tommy Schuman Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
2
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
3
Hospice of Southern Illinois Inc

Care to terminal patients/families

Human Services
4
Housing Opportunities and Maintenance for the Elderly Inc

Committed to improving the quality of life for chicago's low-income elderly, housing opportunities and maintenance for the elderly (h.o.m.e.) helps seniors remain independent and part of their community by offering opportunities for…

—
5
Almost Home Kids

Almost home kids provides a bridge from hospital to home through an innovative community-based care system for children with medical complexities. almost home kids responds to the needs of families, trains caregivers, offers respite care,…

Human Services
6
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
7
The Boulevard of Chicago Inc

Short-term shelter, health and social services for homeless adults who are recovering from illness and injury.

Housing & Shelter
8
Als United Greater Chicago

To find a cure for als, provide persons living with als and families support and advocate on behalf of the als community

Health
9
Chair the Hope Inc

Providing wheelchairs to individuals worldwide

Philanthropy
10
Chicago Survivors Inc

Offer crisis intervention, supportive counseling and comprehensive referral services to surviving family members throughout chicago following homicide; provide training in sensitive and effective communication with and treatment of…

Youth Development
11
Chicago Sun Times Charity Trust
—
12
Hands of Hope Illinois
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is The Home 2 Home Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MY JOYFUL HEART NFP: $73,615 · Human ServicesMY JOYFUL HEART NFPSWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $27,020 · Human ServicesSWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATIONJoliet Area Community Hospice Corp: $26,545 · Human ServicesJoliet Area Community Hospice CorpAlmost Home Chicago Inc: $22,950 · Human ServicesAlmost Home Chicago IncMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $14,195 · Human ServicesMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNAWS: $23,591 · OtherNAWSDepaul USA Dax Program: $19,245 · OtherDepaul USA Dax ProgramSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF SYLVANIA: $18,870 · OtherSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF SYLVANIAOne Love Global Wellness: $17,770 · OtherOne Love Global WellnessNEVER ALONE FOOD PANTRY: $10,275 · OtherNEVER ALONE FOOD PANTRYMorning Start Mission: $6,000 · OtherMorning Start Mission+12 more: $8,406 · Other+12 moreTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT: $47,779 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOME 2 HOME…TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $21,500 · EducationFIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION: $3,050 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $500 · HealthCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthThe Humane Society of Stillwater Oklahoma Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsBALLET MAGNIFICAT INC: $250 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$165,325Other$104,157Housing & Shelter$47,779Education$21,500Philanthropy$3,050Health$2,500Animals$1,000Arts & Culture$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMY JOYFUL HEART NFP: $73,615 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT: $47,779 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetSWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION: $27,020 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetJoliet Area Community Hospice Corp: $26,545 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlmost Home Chicago Inc: $22,950 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $21,500 over 4y, 21% of budgetMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $14,195 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION: $3,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Humane Society of Stillwater Oklahoma Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET MAGNIFICAT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MY JOYFUL HEART NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SWIFT OUTDOOR ACCESSIBLE RECREATION ↗
  • Who funds Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home Chicago Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds The Humane Society of Stillwater Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF NEW LENOX TOWNSHIP ↗
  • Who funds RESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLET MAGNIFICAT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp?

Find your warmest path to The Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smith 5 Private Foundation Nfp’s filings →

More from the funding graph