Skip to content

· Public charity

The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc

Operate exclusively for charitable and educational purposes for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and /or to carry out the purposes of the american foundation, inc., an arizona nonprofit corporatoin, which is exempt under ss 501(1)(3) of the code

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$37MEnvironment$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.3MAnimals$377kEducation$300kInternational$210k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $255k
  • $250k+3 grants · $13M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$152M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE$12,020,000
PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$340,000
HUBBARD COLLEGE OF ADMINISTRA$300,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHARI$204,980
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIO$50,000
CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM$20,000
RESCUE PINK$15,000
INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL$10,000
CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHARI: $205k → 11%INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL: $20k → 8%LAWRENCE ANTHONY EARTH ORGANI: $10k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY: $50k → 12%INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL: $37k → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE: $192k → 12%INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL: $10k → 8%LAWRENCE ANTHONY EARTH ORGANI: $10k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY: $10k → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE: $100k → 12%LAWRENCE ANTHONY EARTH ORGANI: $10k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY: $10k → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE: $12.0M → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIO: $1.7M → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE: $12.0M → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIO: $200k → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SE: $11.0M → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIO: $180k → 14%CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN: $10k → 12%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIO: $50k → 14%CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM: $20k → 12%CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN: $10k → 14%HUBBARD COLLEGE OF ADMINISTRA: $300k → 12%RESCUE PINK: $15k → 12%RESCUE PINK: $15k → 12%PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $340k → 12%PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250k → 12%PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40M · 9 repeat orgs$700k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$40M
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SJOUWERMAN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $292k · revenue ×169
  • FS
    FARM SANCTUARY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +7%
  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTOLOGISTS
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $160k · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Mercy for Animals Inc

Mercy for animals' mission is to construct a compassionate food system that is not just kind to animals but essential for the future of our planet and all who share it. our vision of a world where animals are respected, protected, and free…

Animals
6
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
7
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
8
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
Hawaiian Humane Society

The hawaiian humane society works to improve the welfare of animals through animal care, education, legislation, and prevention on the island of oahu. its mission is to promote the human-animal bond and the humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
12
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC: $35,080,000 · OtherCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION INCCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST: $2,160,000 · OtherCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST+3 more: $530,000 · OtherFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc: $2,600,000 · Environment+1 more: $30,000 · EnvironmentPINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $790,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SJOUWERMAN FOUNDATION INC: $292,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHARITABLE SUPPORT INC: $204,980 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC: $160,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $70,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $66,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $30,000 · AnimalsClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: $30,000 · AnimalsCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $10,000 · International
Other$37,770,000Environment$2,630,000Philanthropy$1,286,980Animals$356,500International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc: $2,600,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetPINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $790,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE SJOUWERMAN FOUNDATION INC: $292,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHARITABLE SUPPORT INC: $204,980 over 1y, 17% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC: $160,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $66,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EARTH ORGANIZATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Sjouwerman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sjouwerman’s filings →

More from the funding graph