Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sink and Mickey Family Foundation F/K/A the Mickey Truck Bodies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$289kHealth$213kHuman Services$46kYouth Development$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHousing & Shelter$5kCommunity Improvement$5kReligion$3k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT$55,448
HORSEPOWER FOUNDATION$25,000
ROC SOLID FOUNDATION$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER HP$20,700
HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER$10,000
YMCA OF HIGH POINT$10,000
HIGH POINT REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
GO FAR$5,000
HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT$2,000
OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES$1,200
PROSPECT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
CHILDRESS INSTITUTE FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES: $100 → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%HORSEPOWER FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NE
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 15 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$725k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-1%

Still filing today

60%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +55%
  • HI
    HORSEPOWER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +86%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • GH
    GROWING HIGH POINT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
High Point Regional Health

To improve health, elevate hope, and advance healing for all.

Health
2
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
3
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
4
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
5
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
6
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
7
Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

—
8
Wellstar Health System Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
9
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
10
Au Medical Center Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Education
11
Medical Park Hospital Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
12
Wakemed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Point Regional Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Childress Institute for Pediatric Trauma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC: $344,569 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER HP: $41,350 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS O…YMCA OF HIGH POINT: $40,000 · OtherYMCA OF HIGH POINTJDRF: $37,100 · OtherJDRFTHE SALVATION ARMY: $11,100 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $11,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMON…+10 more: $14,050 · Other+10 moreROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · HealthROC SOLID FOUNDATION I…HIGH POINT REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthHIGH POINT REGIONAL HE…+4 more: $8,200 · Health+4 moreHORSEPOWER INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesHORSEPOWER IN…HORSEPOWER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHORSEPOWER FO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…+2 more: $600 · Human ServicesGO FAR Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC: $6,200 · Housing & ShelterGROWING HIGH POINT: $5,000 · Community ImprovementArts For Life: $500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$344,569Other$154,600Health$153,200Human Services$90,600Youth Development$25,000Housing & Shelter$6,200Community Improvement$5,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC: $344,569 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHORSEPOWER INC: $55,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetGO FAR Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHIGH POINT REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC: $6,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetArts For Life: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSEPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSEPOWER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GO FAR Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HIGH POINT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRESS INSTITUTE FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMA ↗
  • Who funds Arts For Life ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl and Kathryn Congdon Family FoundationDE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl and Kathryn Congdon Family Foundation · The Ann G and Vann York Foundation · McInnis Family Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Hayworth Foundation · The Apat & Kathryne Lbrown Foundation · Brayton Family Charitable Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sink and Mickey Family Foundation F/K/A the Mickey Truck Bodies Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sink and Mickey Family Foundation F/K/A the Mickey Truck Bodies Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sink and Mickey Family Foundation F/K/A the Mickey Truck Bodies’ filings →

More from the funding graph