Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Silverbird 29 Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$602kHuman Services$338kCommunity Improvement$230kReligion$220kYouth Development$201kSocial Science$200kRecreation & Sports$100kInternational$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $978k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL OUR KIN$300,000
ASHOKA FELLOW PROGRAMS$200,000
ARBOR BROTHERS INC$150,000
FAITHFACTS FOR EDUCATION$100,000
ROOM TO READ$100,000
STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS$100,000
CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION$78,333
Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc$50,000
YOUTH BUSINESS INITIATIVE INC$50,000
KITES NEST$50,000
BRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE$50,000
INTEMPO ORGANIZATION INC$50,000
UPDAYA ORHANIZATION FOR KARUNA TRAINING$30,000
RYASAP$25,000
WHOLESCHOOL MINDFULNESS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY MINDFULNESS PROJECT: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
CO
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
2
Reading Partners

To ensure that every student can become a confident, independent, and lifelong reader by partnering with schools and communities to provide personalized, evidence-based literacy support and individualized instruction. the organization…

Education
3
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
4
Readyct Inc

Readyct works to advance academic excellence and career-connected learning for all public school students in connecticut through collaboration with business, civic, and education leaders.

Education
5
Youth Communication Ny Center Inc

Youth communication elevates teen voices to create real change. through the power of true stories, written by youth who have been systemically marginalized, we create more supportive and successful learning communities. youth…

Arts & Culture
6
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
7
Community-Word Project Inc

Our mission is to facilitate culturally responsive, multidisciplinary art programs for students, teaching artists, and communities to develop and amplify their voices and creative skills.

Education
8
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

—
9
Whole Child Collaborative

To provide a holistic, multidisciplinary education to learners of all abilities

Education
10
Social Impact Partners Inc

Social Impact Partners ("SIP") is an innovative nonprofit organization dedicated to closing the opportunity divide in Connecticut by expanding pathways to living wage jobs and economic mobility for all, working with partners across the…

Human Services
11
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
12
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wellbeing Action for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shred Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHOKA: $300,000 · OtherASHOKAASHOKA FELLOW PROGRAMS: $200,000 · OtherASHOKA FELLOW PROGRAMSARBOR BROTHERS INC: $150,000 · OtherARBOR BROTHERS INCAPS (13-6152801) CONTRIBUTIONSEXPENSES: $112,468 · OtherAPS (13-6152801) CONTRIBUTIONSEXPENSESFAITHHACTS FOR EDUCATION, INC: $100,000 · OtherFAITHHACTS FOR EDUCATION, INCSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS: $100,000 · OtherSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPSCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $73,333 · OtherCHARLES SCHWAB & CO, INC (APS FUND): $70,000 · Other+26 more: $445,000 · Other+26 moreALL OUR KIN INC: $300,000 · EducationALL OUR KIN INCFAITHACTS FOR EDUCATION INC: $100,000 · EducationFAITHACTS FOR EDUCATION IN…ROOM TO READ: $100,000 · EducationROOM TO READCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $78,333 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDA…WholeSchool Mindfulness Inc: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $150,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $100,000 · InternationalKITE'S NEST INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementYOUTH BUSINESS INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHRED FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,550,801Education$623,333Philanthropy$200,000International$100,000Community Improvement$60,000Youth Development$60,000Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL OUR KIN INC: $300,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $150,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFAITHACTS FOR EDUCATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetROOM TO READ: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $78,333 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetKITE'S NEST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINTEMPO ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetYOUTH BUSINESS INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetWholeSchool Mindfulness Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCATALYST CT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWELLBEING ACTION FOR YOUTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY MINDFULNESS PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREMEDY HALL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAMSTOWN RURAL LANDS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL OUR KIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITHACTS FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KITE'S NEST INC ↗
  • Who funds INTEMPO ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH BUSINESS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds WholeSchool Mindfulness Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CT INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLBEING ACTION FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MINDFULNESS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Tauck Family Foundation · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Silverbird 29 Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Silverbird 29 Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Child Care of the Berkshires Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Catalyst Ct Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Youth Business Initiative: 36% of income from government
  • Bridgeport Youth Lacrosse Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Community Access to the Arts Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Intempo Organization Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Silverbird 29 Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Silverbird 29 Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silverbird 29’s filings →

More from the funding graph