Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sigmund Cohn Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$149kHuman Services$65kArts & Culture$45kEducation$35kPhilanthropy$15kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$10kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCCA$19,200
WESTCHESTER LAND TRUST$7,400
WESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION$5,600
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD$5,000
COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$4,000
MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER$3,500
CAPE COD TROUT UNLIMITED (CHAPTER 460)$2,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION$1,000
BEDFORD 2030$1,000
THE RECORDER NEWS INC$1,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,000
EARTHWATCH$1,000
BEADS FOR EDUCATION$700
WESTMORELAND SANCTUARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $3k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$346k · 23 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$346k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+26%

Still filing today

78%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +330%
  • AT
    ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +479%
  • WL
    Westchester Land Trust Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FUNDS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TG
    THE GRAHAM SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -81%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
2
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
3
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
4
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
7
Westport Land Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve and protect westport massachusetts natural resources for people and nature, and to educate the public about the wise use of natural resources.

Environment
8
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
9
Wallkill Valley Land Trust

To promote the preservation, protection, and balanced use of the wallkill valley through acquisition, holding, and management of fee simple title conservation easements.

—
10
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
11
Northern Neck Land Conservancy

Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…

Environment
12
New York League of Conservation Voters Education Fund

See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Parks Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sloatsburg Food Pantry Inc Dba Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JCCA: $63,600 · OtherJCCAEARTHWATCH: $19,000 · OtherEARTHWATCHWESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $15,600 · OtherWESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCOMMUNITY FUNDS INC: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUNDS INCWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $37,500 · Other+17 moreASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD IN…Westchester Land Trust Inc: $28,950 · EnvironmentWestchester Land Trust IncNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $21,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIA…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL I…RIVERKEEPER INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INCBEDFORD 2030 INC: $8,030 · EnvironmentBEDFORD 2030 INC+2 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $38,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY …THE HARVEY SCHOOL: $19,000 · EducationTHE HARVE…THE GRAHAM SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 · EducationTHE GRAHA…BEADS FOR EDUCATION INC: $4,850 · EducationBEADS FOR…WELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY: $3,100 · EducationWELLFLEET…MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $28,500 · Human ServicesMAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 · PhilanthropySANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$172,700Environment$124,730Recreation & Sports$38,000Education$32,250Human Services$28,500Philanthropy$5,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $38,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $30,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $28,950 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $28,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $21,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $15,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD 2030 INC: $8,030 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAHAM SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 over 1y, 21% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEADS FOR EDUCATION INC: $4,850 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMORELAND SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMarsh Sanctuary Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetWELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY: $3,100 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESSCNY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLFLEET CONSERVATION TRUST: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORFUL KIDZ INC: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLOATSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC DBA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWild Seed Project: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARVEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD 2030 INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAHAM SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds BEADS FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Marsh Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds WELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSCNY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLFLEET CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORDER NEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORFUL KIDZ INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SLOATSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC DBA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Wild Seed Project ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tarnok Family Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tarnok Family Foundation Inc · Lanbro Foundation · The Braewold Fund · Ibm International Foundation · Jandon Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sigmund Cohn Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sigmund Cohn Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sigmund Cohn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph