Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sievert Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$332k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$880kEducation$717kHealth$102kRecreation & Sports$93kCommunity Improvement$80kArts & Culture$56kHuman Services$48kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $186k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$76,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$60,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$25,000
GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NORTHVILLE$15,000
CHRISTIAN BUSINESS ROUND TABLE INC$15,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$10,000
JOHN WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
REACHING INDIANS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
BETHANY CHAPEL$5,000
CENTER FOR THE ARTS LAKE SUNAPEE REGION$5,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$3,000
YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM$2,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%DONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%INSIGHT SEMINARS INC: $500 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 13%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $3k → 15%REALITY CHECK INC: $1k → 9%INSIGHT SEMINARS INC: $500 → 14%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $1k → 15%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $500 → 15%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $2k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%CRANBERRY SUNSET FARM INC: $3k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 9%GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $500 → 7%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $750 → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of The Sievert Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Sievert Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 78 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

78 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
56

Total granted

$1.8M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

65%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    Luis Palau Association
    5× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +39%
  • NOVI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $60k · revenue +96%
  • YV
    Yampa Valley Autism Program
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • OH
    ORCHARD HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

3
New Name Counseling and Teaching Center Inc

Our mission is to glorify god and serve our community by assisting people in finding freedom from their past, peace in their present, and hope for their future.

Religion
4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

8
Gordon College

Gordon college strives to graduate men & women distinguished by (continued on schedule o) (continuation) intellectual maturity and christian character, committed to lives of service and prepared for leadership worldwide.

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization

The lausanne movement exists to activate the body of christ to accelerate global mission together through convening global influencers, creating biblically grounded missional content, fostering catalytic collaboration, and equipping…

Religion
11
Purehope Coalition

Our mission is to shape a world free of sexual exploitation and brokenness by providing christian solutions in a sexualized culture.continued on schedule owe equip parents and college students to lead a lifestyle of prayer, understanding,…

Civil Rights
12
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gathering of the Tribes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Addiction Recovery ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Food PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…School District FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%39%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/116
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,449

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/88
Grantees still filing
60/88
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $337,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHYALE UNIVERSITY — $245,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $125,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYJOHN WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $120,000 · OtherJOHN WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHGRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $65,300 · OtherNOVI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NORTHVILLE — $50,000 · Other+90 more — $395,200 · Other+90 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $135,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLE…KING SCHOOL INC — $34,500 · EducationKING SCHOOL INCAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $27,500 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE…THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationTHE ACTUARIAL F…NOVI ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $22,500 · EducationNOVI ATHLETIC B…The American College — $15,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · Education+6 more — $12,750 · EducationLuis Palau Association — $115,000 · ReligionLuis Palau …REACHING INDIANS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC — $80,000 · ReligionREACHING IN…+10 more — $24,000 · Religion+10 moreYampa Valley Autism Program — $42,150 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE POLICY RESEARCH — $13,250 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $7,250 · Human ServicesHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $4,000 · Human Services+8 more — $10,250 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $20,500 · Arts & CultureGATHERING OF THE TRIBES — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION — $9,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $750 · Arts & CultureCHRISTIAN BUSINESS ROUND TABLE INC — $40,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,397,500Education$285,250Religion$219,000Human Services$76,900Arts & Culture$50,750Community Improvement$40,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLuis Palau Association — $115,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREACHING INDIANS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC — $80,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNOVI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program — $42,150 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN BUSINESS ROUND TABLE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC — $34,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNOVI ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $22,500 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $20,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGATHERING OF THE TRIBES — $20,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetInterstitial Cystitis Association of America Inc — $17,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetThe American College — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE POLICY RESEARCH — $13,250 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION — $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE MINISTRIES OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOREVER INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHARMONY HOME MINISTRY — $8,900 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetARIA COVEY FOUNDATION INC — $8,750 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetPTSA CONNECTICUT INC — $8,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetDUO DUO ANIMAL WELFARE PROJECT INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $7,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES — $6,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEco Defense Group — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetENGAGE WEST AFRICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINSCAPE CENTER FOR PERSONAL VOCATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercatus Center Inc — $3,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN MANNA MINISTRIES — $3,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFarmsteads of New England Inc — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM STAFFING INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMULE DEER FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGates Recovery Center — $2,750 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCRANBERRY SUNSET FARM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NEW ENGLAND AND NEW JERSEY INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABANDONED PET PROJECT — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget1269 CAFE MINISTRIES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID'S TENT USA INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVISION INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS — $2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association
  • Who funds REACHING INDIANS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds NOVI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Yampa Valley Autism Program
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN BUSINESS ROUND TABLE INC
  • Who funds KING SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
  • Who funds NORTHVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NOVI ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY
  • Who funds GATHERING OF THE TRIBES
  • Who funds Interstitial Cystitis Association of America Inc
  • Who funds The American College
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE POLICY RESEARCH
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION
  • Who funds NEW LIFE MINISTRIES OF NEW ENGLAND INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOREVER INC
  • Who funds HARMONY HOME MINISTRY
  • Who funds ARIA COVEY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DREAMCATCHERS NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • Who funds PTSA CONNECTICUT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH19.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Great NH Restaurants Charitable Trust · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Cecil B Day Foundation Inc · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · The Horne Family Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Point32health Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sievert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Coonamessett Farm Foundation Inc88% of income from government
  • Living Independently Forever Inc66% of income from government
  • The Midas Collaborative Inc39% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc24% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center10% of income from government
  • Boston Korean Adoptees Inc8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees0% of income from government
  • Riverview School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph