Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Siegel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$285kInternational$73kHuman Services$49kPhilanthropy$27kFood & Nutrition$23kEnvironment$18kHealth$18kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIZEL INSTITUTE$10,000
SHELBURNE FARMS$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH$3,000
PUBLIC COUNSEL$3,000
PRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF AUSTIN$2,000
FOOD BANK OF MONTEREY COUNTY$2,000
SHUMAN HEARTHOUSE$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
NRDC$1,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONS$1,000
UNHCR$1,000
MEND$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MONTEREY COUNTY$1,000
AUDUBON SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEND: $2k → 14%MEND: $2k → 14%MEND: $1k → 14%MEND: $1k → 14%MEND: $1k → 14%MEND: $1k → 14%MEND: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
CA
CO
KY
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$458k · 28 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$458k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+36%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UC LAW SF FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $165k · revenue +56%
  • LG
    LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +22%
  • SHELBURNE FARMS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMEN CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • C1
    CHP 11-99 FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +36%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
8
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Brightfocus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UC LAW SF FOUNDATION: $164,500 · EducationUC LAW SF FOUNDATIONPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,050 · EducationCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLMAKE-A-WISH: $33,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISHCITY OF HOPE: $20,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEAMEN CENTER: $13,100 · OtherAMEN CENTERFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $12,500 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $12,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES+31 more: $71,325 · Other+31 moreLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureLION GLOBAL F…SHELBURNE FARMS: $16,000 · EnvironmentBig Sur Land Trust: $5,500 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE: $2,000 · EnvironmentSANTA LUCIA CONSERVANCY: $1,500 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $7,500 · InternationalMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $8,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Education$232,550Other$211,925Arts & Culture$70,000Environment$25,000International$15,000Human Services$8,000Recreation & Sports$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC LAW SF FOUNDATION: $164,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $3,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA LUCIA CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER LEAGUE OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UC LAW SF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Sur Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds SANTA LUCIA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LEAGUE OF COLORADO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH13.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Siegel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Siegel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Siegel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Siegel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Siegel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph