Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $68k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
10
18
10
19
15
20
11
21
12
22
10
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.9MFood & Nutrition$110kHealth$84kReligion$83kInternational$43kEducation$35kArts & Culture$27kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC OF MID WESTCHESTER$20,100
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HIAS$5,000
JCC ON THE HUDSON$2,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTE INC (JDC)$2,000
AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC$2,000
UJA FEDERATION$2,000
OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTERILDREN$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
CAMP NEJEDA$1,000
PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$1,000
WESTCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000
THIRTEENWNET$1,000
YIVO$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 9%THE OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 9%THE OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
VA
MD
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$455k · 31 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
6

Total granted

$455k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+3%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +31%
  • WM
    Westchester Medical Center Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $22k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +3%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
3
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
4
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
7
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
8
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
12
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Multiple Sclerosis Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr20%20%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr14%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr20%2%20–35yr13%95%35–55yr14%3%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
11%
4,652/42,164

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,892,451 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $80,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHES…JCC OF MID WESTCHESTER — $69,700 · OtherJCC OF MID WESTC…CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK — $35,000 · OtherCITY COLLEGE OF …PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $26,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHO…JCC ON THE HUDSON — $21,000 · OtherJCC ON THE HUDSO…FOOD BANK OF WESTCHESTER — $18,000 · OtherNARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA — $12,500 · Other+23 more — $78,351 · Other+23 moreWestchester Medical Center Foundation — $30,000 · HealthPHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $18,000 · HealthAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $2,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,600 · InternationalHIAS INC — $10,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $6,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $5,000 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $16,200 · PhilanthropyCAMP NEJEDA FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesOssining Food Pantry — $3,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$1,892,451Other$340,551Health$50,000International$42,600Philanthropy$16,200Recreation & Sports$15,000Human Services$14,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,892,451 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation — $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $16,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NEJEDA FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $11,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Food Pantry — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
  • Who funds Westchester Medical Center Foundation
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds CAMP NEJEDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC
  • Who funds Ossining Food Pantry
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
  • Who funds AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bessemer Giving FundNJ15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Sidney and Betty Shames Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph