Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sidhu Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$296k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.3MHuman Services$125kYouth Development$109kCommunity Improvement$89kHealth$51kInternational$46kArts & Culture$27kEnvironment$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $176k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELON UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT$175,500
MY FUTURE PATHWAYS$25,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
GUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$10,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$10,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$7,500
CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA$5,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$5,000
MILTON ACADEMY$3,000
GIVENGAIN FOUNDATION$2,000
THE CHAPIN SCHOOL$1,500
UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$1,000
WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MY FUTURE PATHWAYS: $25k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 31 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
24

Total granted

$2.6M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+6%

Still filing today

58%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILTON ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +12%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • AW
    AL WOOTEN CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • P
    PRATHAM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SB
    SALAAM BAALAK TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
10
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Highland Preparatory School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leaving Legacies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELON UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT: $928,600 · OtherELON UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENTMIDDLESEX SCHOOL CONCORD: $226,800 · OtherMIDDLESEX SCHOOL CONCORDTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE LAWRENCE SCHOOL SANAWAR: $94,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $85,000 · Other+29 more: $221,184 · Other+29 moreMILTON ACADEMY: $275,450 · EducationMILTON ACADEMYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $168,250 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $51,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY+6 more: $57,900 · Education+6 moreGUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USA: $20,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $6,050 · PhilanthropyVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $38,100 · Community ImprovementMY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesUNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $2,925 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $2,765 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,250 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureTHE MCKENZIE NOELLE WILSON FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,986,084Education$552,600Philanthropy$116,050Community Improvement$38,100Human Services$27,500Arts & Culture$14,040Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $275,450 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $168,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 9y, 58% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $38,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS: $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $11,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKATE & JUSTIN ROSE FOUNDATION INC CO WATSON SLOANE PLLC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MCKENZIE NOELLE WILSON FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $2,925 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $2,765 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREAD ALLIANCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN RESCUES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTILTH ALLIANCE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
  • Who funds KATE & JUSTIN ROSE FOUNDATION INC CO WATSON SLOANE PLLC ↗
  • Who funds THE MCKENZIE NOELLE WILSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY13.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sidhu Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sidhu Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
  • United Arts of Central Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Orlando Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sidhu Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph