Skip to content
The Sharon D Lund Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Sharon D Lund Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
55
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$625k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$19MArts & Culture$7.8MEducation$7.2MHuman Services$6.3MPhilanthropy$5.9MYouth Development$2.3MAnimals$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$900kOther$0
02FY2024 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.3M
$60,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIVE CREST$625,000
CHOC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$537,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$523,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA$500,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - LA$450,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC$325,000
THE FROSTIG CENTER$300,000
RYMAN ARTS$225,000
GIVE KIDS THE WORLD$200,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS$200,000
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$200,000
SAVE THE FAMILY$150,000
GUIDE DOGS OF DESERT$125,000
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$110,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%CHILDHELP USA: $75k → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $100k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $100k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $50k → 11%CHILDHELP USA: $40k → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS: $50k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $50k → 11%CATERINA'S CLUB: $75k → 14%CHILDHELP USA: $150k → 11%CATERINA'S CLUB: $60k → 14%CHILDHELP USA: $150k → 11%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $50k → 14%CHILDHELP USA: $150k → 11%CHILDHELP USA: $75k → 11%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $50k → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $50k → 10%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $50k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $60k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $60k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $60k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $50k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES (SOS): $50k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES (SOS): $50k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES (SOS): $25k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES (SOS): $25k → 10%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $60k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $60k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $55k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $50k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $50k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $100k → 10%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $60k → 10%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $50k → 14%CATERINA'S CLUB: $110k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $60k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $40k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $100k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $75k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $80k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $80k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $50k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48M · 68 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
8

Total granted

$48M
$850k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +103%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +78%
  • MF
    MARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • PI
    PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue 0%
  • H
    HOMEAID
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
2
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
3
California Children's Academy

Cca is committed to preparing young children to be global citizens who are developmentally well-rounded, emotionally literate, and environmentally conscious.

—
4
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
5
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
For the Children

To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…

Recreation & Sports
8
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
9
Children's Law Center of California

Children's law center of california (clc) provides legal representation for children and youth impacted by abuse and neglect. we advocate for our clients by supporting families; fighting for reunification, permanence, educational…

—
10
Children's Dental Foundation

To deliver oral health education and comprehensive treatment for economically disadvantaged children, including those with complex medical considerations, while also providing premier training in pediatric and multi-specialty dentistry.

Health
11
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
39/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,505,000 · OtherDR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONOPERATION SMILE - MISSION: $1,500,000 · OtherOPERATION SMILE - MISSIONGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $1,425,000 · OtherGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INCSAVE THE FAMILY: $1,100,000 · OtherSAVE THE FAMILYVOA - MAUD BOOTH CENTER: $900,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $900,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SC: $730,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL ORANGE COUNTY: $710,717 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC: $608,493 · Other+41 more: $8,472,786 · Other+41 moreCHOC FOUNDATION: $6,547,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,500,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Ang…OLIVE CREST: $1,395,000 · HealthOLIVE CRESTPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's HospitalFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $815,000 · HealthFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSIONCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,378,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUN…ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,013,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COM…THE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $1,680,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RYMAN-CARROLL…RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $1,450,000 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S H…+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY: $2,817,000 · EducationMARIANNE FROS…RIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC: $1,842,000 · EducationRIVERVIEW SCH…LEARNING WITH A DIFFERENCE INC: $1,442,000 · EducationLEARNING WITH…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $270,000 · Education+1 more: $50,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $1,630,000 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $1,280,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $450,000 · Arts & CultureArt Division: $360,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WALT DISNEY HOMETOWN MUSEUM: $210,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDHELP INC: $640,000 · Human ServicesInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $485,000 · Human ServicesJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $460,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $395,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves Corporation: $380,000 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUB: $345,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION SMILE INC: $850,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $100,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 · International
Other$17,851,996Health$13,257,000Philanthropy$8,571,000Education$6,421,000Arts & Culture$3,930,000Human Services$3,305,000International$1,050,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $6,547,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,500,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,378,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY: $2,817,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,013,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC: $1,842,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $1,680,000 over 8y, 24% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $1,630,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,505,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $1,450,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLEARNING WITH A DIFFERENCE INC: $1,442,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $1,425,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $1,395,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $1,280,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $850,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $815,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $640,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHEEPFOLD INC: $518,356 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG AMERICANS INC: $513,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND: $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $485,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $460,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $450,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $450,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFOSTERALL: $445,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $412,467 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $400,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $395,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $380,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetArt Division: $360,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $345,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSTRIVE FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $270,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetTHE WALT DISNEY HOMETOWN MUSEUM: $210,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT: $200,963 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrackens Kitchen Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds DR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING WITH A DIFFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHEEPFOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG AMERICANS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND ↗
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
  • Who funds JOHN TRACY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERALL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL MINDS ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Orange County Communi…The Ahmanson Foundati…American Endowment Fo…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…Carl E Wynn FoundationAudrey & Sydney Irmas…Thomas & Dorothy Leav…The Devto Support Fou…Carrie Estelle Doheny…Argyros Family Founda…
California Community FoundationCA26.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Carl E Wynn Foundation · Audrey & Sydney Irmas Charitable Foundation · Thomas & Dorothy Leavey Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sharon D Lund Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sharon D Lund Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Riverview School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sharon D Lund Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sharon D Lund Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sharon D Lund’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home