· Public charity
The Shackelford Family Foundation
THE SHACKELFORD FAMILY FOUNDATION is a supporting organization of the columbus foundation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $340,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $374,400 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $34,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALING TOWERS | $50,000 |
| STAR HOUSE | $50,000 |
| MOMENTUM-EXCELLENCE INC | $50,000 |
| END FUND INC | $50,000 |
| COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART | $30,000 |
| I KNOW I CAN | $30,000 |
| THURBER HOUSE INCORPORATED | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC | $25,000 |
| HARMONY PROJECT PRODUCTIONS INC | $20,000 |
| RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DUDENISON UNIVERSITY4× · 2018–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +17%
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $570k · revenue +36%
- MIMOMENTUM-EXCELLENCE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- TNTHE NANTUCKET EDUCATION TRUST INCone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +16%
- GSGIGI'S SHELTER FOR DOGSone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -62%
- OPOhio Progressive Collaborative Education Fundone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering people. saving wildlife.
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.
Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.
The columbus association of realtors is a local level, not-for-profit trade association. founded in 1908, columbus association of realtors is comprised of more than 9,100 real estate professionals engaged in residential sales and leasing,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Musica Chamber Orchestra of Columbus Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM-EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds I KNOW I CAN ↗
- Who funds HEALING TOWERS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
- Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds The End Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NANTUCKET EDUCATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIGI'S SHELTER FOR DOGS ↗
- Who funds Ohio Progressive Collaborative Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Network for Animals USA Inc ↗
- Who funds THE THURBER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HARMONY PROJECT PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds SHIPLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE OWEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JAZZ ARTS GROUP ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FOR COLUMBUS AND FRANKLIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds NETCARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Cardinal Health Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation · Meuse Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Hinson Family Trust Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Shackelford Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Shackelford Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Shackelford Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.